Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 39, Issue 1 , Pages 13-17, January 2007

Use of a Weight Loss Index for Evaluating Weight Management in Adults

  • Wayne C. Miller, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence: Wayne C. Miller PhD, Department of Exercise Science, The George Washington University, 817 23rd Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20052; Tel: (202) 994-2952; Fax: (202) 994-1420
  • ,
  • Hilary L. Henricson, MS
  • ,
  • Megan M. Moreland, MS

Department of Exercise Science, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Abstract 

Objective

A quantitative method for evaluating weight loss using the body mass index (BMI) standard 25, during part or the entire weight loss continuum, was designed and tested.

Design

Weight Loss Index (WLI) represents the area under the curve of the graphical representation of the weight loss attempt; x-axis=time, y-axis=BMI, BMI standard=25.0.

Setting

Reliability of the WLI for 1-5 years of weight loss efforts in 50 overweight (BMI=39.1±7.6) patients was evaluated by comparing their calculated WLI to a weight loss ratio, derived using a traditional 2-point comparison. Weight Loss Index sensitivity was tested by sending weight loss scenarios to obesity experts, who were asked to rank success of each weight loss attempt within a scenario. Expert rankings were compared to WLI rankings.

Variables Measured

Age, weight, height, BMI, WLI.

Analysis

Dependent t-test for WLI versus pre-post BMI values. Spearman’s correlation coefficients for WLI versus expert rankings. Significance, P<.05.

Results

Weight Loss Index better described weight loss attempts for overweight adults than did traditional 2-point comparisons. Obesity experts could not distinguish differences in weight loss success among patients with fluctuating weights, but the WLI categorically ranked these individuals.

Conclusions and Implications

Using the WLI, researchers and clinicians can compare the weight loss attempts within an individual, among individuals, and among groups of individuals against the standard BMI reference of 25.0.

Key Words: BMI, weight loss, weight maintenance, weight control, obesity treatment

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Continuing Education Questionnaire available at www.sne.orgMeets Learning Need Codes for RDs and DTRs 3030, 5370, and 9070.This research was supported by the George Washington University Obesity Management Program and the Department of Exercise Science at the George Washington University Medical Center.

PII: S1499-4046(06)00570-7

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2006.07.009

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 39, Issue 1 , Pages 13-17, January 2007