Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 39, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages S25-S31 , March 2007

Developing Ratings for Food Products: Lessons Learned From Media Rating Systems

  • Dale Kunkel, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAuthor for correspondence: Dale Kunkel, PhD, Department of Communication, University of Arizona, 1103 E. University Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721; Tel.: (520) 307-0698; Fax: (520) 621-5504
    • ,
  • Christopher McKinley, MA

References 

  1. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press; 2005;
  2. Kunkel D, Wilcox BL, Cantor J, Palmer E, Linn S, Dowrick P. Report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Advertising and Children: APA. 2004;
  3. Story M, French S. Food advertising and marketing directed at children and adolescents in the US. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act [serial online]. 2004;1:3–20Available at: http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/1/1/3. Accessed December 8, 2005
  4. Hawkes C. Marketing Food to Children: The Global Regulatory Environment. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004;
  5. WHO and FAO (World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization). Diet, Nutrition, and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003;
  6. Mathews A, Cowburn G, Rayner M, Longfield J, Powell C. The Marketing of Unhealthy Food to Children in Europe (A Report of Phase 1 of ‘The Children, Obesity and Associated Avoidable Chronic Diseases’ Project). Brussels, Belgium: European Heart Network; 2005;
  7. Hastings G, Stead M, McDermott L, et al. Review of Research on the Effects of Food Promotion to Children. Glasgow, UK: Center for Social Marketing, University of Strathclyde; 2003;
  8. Livingstone S, Helsper E. Advertising ‘unhealthy’ foods to children: Understanding promotion in the context of children’s daily lives (A review of the literature for the Market Research Department of the Office of Communications (OFCOM): OFCOM). 2004;
  9. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Food Marketing to Children and Youth: Threat or Opportunity?. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press; 2006;
  10. Byrd-Bredbenner C. Saturday morning children’s television advertising: a longitudinal content analysis. Fam Consum Sci Res J. 2002;30:382–403
  11. Gamble M, Cotugna N. A quarter century of TV food advertising targeted at children. Am J Health Behav. 1999;23:261–267
  12. Harrison K, Marske AL. Nutritional content of foods advertised during the television programs children watch most often. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:1568–1574
  13. Kotz K, Story M. Food advertisements during children’s Saturday morning television programming: are they consistent with dietary recommendations?. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:1296–1300
  14. Kunkel D, Gantz W. Children’s television advertising in the multi-channel environment. J Commun. 1992;42:134–152
  15. Kunkel D, McIlrath M. Message content in advertising to children. In:  Palmer E,  Young B editor. Faces of Televisual Media: Teaching, Violence, Selling to Children. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates; 2003;p. 287–300
  16. Jaffe DL. Kids, Cartoons, and Cookies: Should We Restrict the Marketing of Food to Children? Paper presented at: CATO Policy ForumJune 7, 2004; Washington DC. Available at: http://www.cato.org/events/040607pf.html. Accessed December 8, 2005.
  17. Synder W. Address to the Arkansas Advertising Federation, Little Rock, AR. Washington, DC: American Advertising Federation; 2005;October 17
  18. Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, Georgetown Economic Services, LLC. Television advertising and internet viewing of food and restaurant messages: Total TV Ad Expenditures, Total Screen Time, TV Commercials and Web Pages Seen by ChildrenA report to The Grocery Manufacturers of America, The Association of National Advertisers. May 13, 2005. Available at: www.gmabrands.com/publicpolicy/docs/ReporttoGMA-ANA.pdf. Accessed December 8, 2005.
  19. Pereira J. Junk food games. Wall Street Journal. 2004;May 3, B1,B4
  20. Palmer E, Cantor J, Kunkel D, Dowrick P, Linn S, Wilcox B. Psychological Implications of Commercialism in Schools. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Task Force on Advertising and Children; 2004;
  21. Warner M. Selling food to children: Some producers begin a shift to healthier products. New York Times. 2005;December 16, C1, C7
  22. Robinson-Jacobs K. The skinny on Frito-Lay’s plan for chips. The Dallas Morning News [serial online]. 2005;October 23, Available at: http://www.dallasnews.com. Accessed August 30, 2005
  23. Nutrition, health and wellness. Kraft Web site. Available at: http://www.kraft.com. Accessed August 30, 2005.
  24. PepsiCo’s health and wellness philosophy (PepsiCo Web site). 2005;Available at: http://www.pepsico.com. Accessed August 30, 2005
  25. Legault L, Brandt MB, McCabe N, Adler C, Brown A, Brecher S. 2000-2001 Food label and package survey: An update on prevalence of nutrition labeling and claims on processed, packaged foods. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104:952–958
  26. Claims that can be made for conventional foods and dietary supplements. U. S. Food and Drug Administration Web site. 2003;Available at: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/∼dms/hclaims.html. Accessed August 30, 2005
  27. Liebman B. Claims crazy: Which can you believe?. Nutrition Action Health Letter. 2003;30:3–7
  28. Raising the profile of the lowly food label (ACNielsen Web site). 2005;Available at: http://us.acnielsen.com. Accessed September 15, 2005
  29. Kim S, Nayga RM, Capps O. Food label use, self-selectivity, and diet quality. J Consum Aff. 2001;35:346–363
  30. Food label & calorie research: Qualitative research findings (International Food Information Council Web site). 2004;Available at: http://ific.org. Accessed August 30, 2005
  31. Skinner M. Lighting the path to health. Crops. 2005;6–7June 4
  32. Andrews JC, Burton S, Netemeyer RG. Are some comparative nutrition claims misleading? (The role of nutrition knowledge, ad claim type and disclosure conditions). J Advertising. 2000;29:29–42
  33. Keller KL, Staelin R. Effects of quality and quantity of information on decision effectiveness. J Consum Res. 1987;14:200–213
  34. Wansink B. How do front and back package labels influence beliefs about health claims?. J Consum Aff. 2003;37:305–316
  35. Viswanathan M. The influence of summary information on the usage of nutrition information. J Public Policy & Marketing. 1994;13:48–60
  36. Kunkel D, Wilson B, Donnerstein E, et al. Measuring television violence: the importance of context. J Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 1995;39:284–291
  37. Federman J. Rating Sex and Violence in the Media: Media Ratings and Proposals for Reform. Menlo Park, Calif: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2002;
  38. Greenberg BS. The Alphabet Soup of Television Program Ratings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 2001;
  39. Bushman BJ, Cantor J. Media ratings for violence and sex. Am Psychol. 2003;58:130–141
  40. Kaiser Family Foundation. Parents, Media, and Public Policy: A Kaiser Family Foundation Survey. Menlo Park, Calif: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2004;
  41. Navigator. Concept Testing of Alternative Labelling of Healthy/Less Healthy Foods (Research Report). Bucks, UK: Prepared on behalf of Food Standards Agency; 2004;
  42. Navigator. Signpost Labelling: Creative Development of Concepts (Research Report). Bucks, UK: Prepared on behalf of Food Standards Agency; 2005;
  43. Kunkel D, Wilcox B. Children and media policy. In:  Singer DG,  Singer JL editor. Handbook of Children and the Media. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001;p. 589–604
  44. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. We Can! Ways to Enhance Children’s Activity & Nutrition (Families Finding the Balance: A Parent Handbook). Bethesda, Md: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Health Information Center; 2005;
  45. Federal Communications Commission. In the Matter of Children’s Television: Obligations of Digital Television Broadcasters. MM Docket No. 00-167. Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 2004;November 23
  46. Sullivan JL, Jordan AB. Playing by the rules: Impact and implementation of children’s educational television regulations among local broadcasters. Communication Law and Policy. 1999;4:483–511
  47. Birch LL, Zimmerman SI, Hind H. The influence of social-affective context on the formation of children’s food preferences. Child Dev. 1980;51:856–861
  48. Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to foods and children’s eating. Appetite. 1999;32:405–419
  49. Fisher JO, Birch LL. Restricting access to palatable foods affects children’s behavioral response, food selection, and intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:1264–1272
  50. Kunkel D. The road to the V-chip: Television violence and public policy. In:  Gentile DA editors. Media Violence and Children: A Complete Guide For Parents and Professionals. Westport, Conn: Praeger; 2003;p. 227–245

PII: S1499-4046(06)00571-9

doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.07.010

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 39, Issue 2, Supplement , Pages S25-S31 , March 2007

Article Tools