Health Communication Campaigns and Their Impact on Behavior

References 

1. Rogers EM, Storey JD. Communication campaigns. In:  Berger CR,  Chaffee SH editor. Handbook of Communication Science. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1987;p. 817–846
2. Snyder LB. Development communication campaigns. In:  Gutykunst WB,  Mody B editor. Handbook of International and Intercultural Communication. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001;p. 457–478
3. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Fact sheet: Actual Causes of Death in the United States. 2000;Available at: http://www.cdc. gov/nccdphp/factsheets/death _causes2000.htm. Accessed March 26, 2004
4. Huhman M, Potter LD, Wong FL, Banspach SW, Duke JC, Heitzler CD. Effects of a mass media campaign to increase physical activity among children: Year 1 results of the VERB Campaign. Pediatrics. 2005;116:277–284
5. Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:425–431
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
6. Hornik R, Maklan D, Cadell D, et al. Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: Fifth Semi-Annual Report of Findings. Rockville, Md: Westat; 2003;
7. Kiwanuka-Tondo J, Snyder LB. The influence of organizational characteristics and campaign design elements on communication campaign quality: Evidence from 91 Ugandan AIDS Campaigns. J Health Commun. 2002;7:59–77
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Dearing JW, Rogers EM, Meyer G, et al. Social marketing and diffusion-based strategies for communication with unique populations: HIV prevention in San Francisco. J Health Commun. 1996;1:343–363
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
9. Snyder LB. How effective are mediated health campaigns?. In:  Rice R,  Atkin C editor. Public Information Campaigns. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001;p. 181–190
10. Ammerman A, Lindquist C, Hersey J, et al. Efficacy of interventions to modify dietary behavior related to cancer risk. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center; 2001;February, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 25; Contract No. 290-97-0011; AHRQ Publication No. 01-E029. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat1.chapter.35668. Accessed March 30, 2006
11. Bertrand JT, O’Reilly K, Denison J, Anhang R, Sweat M. Systematic review of the effectiveness of mass communication programs to change HIV/AIDS-related behaviors in developing countries. Health Educ Res. 2006;21
12. Derzon JH, Lipsey MW. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass-communication for changing substance-use knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In:  Crano WD,  Burgoon M editor. Mass Media and Drug Prevention: Classic and Contemporary Theories and Research. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002;p. 231–258
13. Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilization. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2002;(Issue 1):Art. No.: CD000389; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000389
14. McArthur DB. Heart healthy eating behaviors of children following a school-based intervention: a meta-analysis. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1998;21(1):35–48
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
15. Pomerleau J, Lock K, Knai C, McKee M. Interventions designed to increase adult fruit and vegetable intake can be effective: a systematic review of the literature. J Nutr. 2005;135:2486–2495
    • MEDLINE
16. Snyder LB, Badiane L, Kalnova S, Diop-Sidibé N. Meta-Analysis of Family Planning Campaigns Advised by the Center for Communication Programs at Johns Hopkins University Compared to Campaigns Conducted and Advised by Other Organizations; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and U.S. Agency for International Development. 2003;
17. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA, Mitchell EW, Kiwanuka-Tondo J, Fleming-Milici F, Proctor D. A meta-analysis of the effect of mediated health communication campaigns on behavior change in the United States. J Health Commun. 2004;9(Supplement 1):71–96
    • CrossRef
18. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA. Meta-analysis of U.S. health campaign effects on behavior: Emphasize enforcement, exposure, and new information, and beware the secular trend. In:  Hornik R editors. Public Health Communication: Evidence for Behavior Change. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002;p. 357–383
19. Snyder LB, Lapierre MA, Maloney EK. Using mass media to improve nutrition: A meta-analytic examination of campaigns and interventions. Paper presented at: 134th Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association; November 4-8, 2006; Boston, Mass.
20. Snyder LB. Meta-analyses of mediated health campaigns. To appear in: Preiss RW, Allen M, et al., eds. Mass Media Research: Advances through Meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Regel B, Wootan MG, Booth-Butterfield S. Using mass media to promote healthy eating: A community-based demonstration project. Prev Med. 1999;29:414–421
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
22. McGuire W. The theoretical foundation of campaigns. In:  Rice RE,  Paisley WJ editor. Public Communication Campaigns. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1981;p. 41–70
23. Andreasen A. Marketing Social Change: Changing Behavior to Promote Health, Social Development, and the Environment. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1995;
24. Manoff R. Social Marketing. New York: Praeger; 1985;
25. Shingi P, Mody B. The communication effects gap: a field experiment in TV and agricultural ignorance in India. In:  Rogers EM editors. Communication and Development: Critical Perspectives. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage; 1976;
26. Hornik RC. Development Communication: Information, Agriculture, and Nutrition in the Third World. New York: Longman Publishing Group; 1988;
27. Fisher JD, Fisher WA. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS risk behavior change: Empirical support and applications. In:  Oskamp S,  Thompson S editor. Understanding and Preventing HIV Risk Behavior: Safer Sex and Drug Use. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1996;p. 100–127
28. Kotler P, Roberto N, Lee N. Social Marketing: Improving the Quality of Life. 2^nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2002;
29. Atkin CK, Freimuth VS. Formative evaluation research in campaign design. In:  Rice RE,  Atkin CK editor. Public Communication Campaigns. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001;p. 125–145
30. Lefebvre RC, Flora JA. Social marketing and public health intervention. Health Educ Q. 1981;15:299–315
    • MEDLINE
31. Griffiths M, Zeitlin M, Manoff RK, Cook TM. Kader Evaluation: Nutrition Communication and Behavior Change Component, Indonesian Nutrition Development Program. New York: Manoff International; 1983;
32. Smith WA. Communications and Social Marketing for Health. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development; 1986;Occasional Paper No. 15
33. Grunig J. Publics, audiences, and market segments: segmentation principles for campaigns. In:  Salmon C editors. Information Campaigns: Balancing Social Values and Social Change. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1989;p. 199–228
34. Institute of Medicine. Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication Strategies for Diverse Population. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002;
35. Snyder LB. Evidence of the Effectiveness of Communication Interventions Across Diverse Populations (Report submitted to the Committee on Communication for Behavior Change in the 21st Century: Improving the Health of Diverse Populations, Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences). 2000;
36. Snyder LB, Rouse R. AIDS messages and risk: Targeting the urban audience. AIDS Education and Prevention: An International Journal. 1992;4(2):143–159
37. Slater MD. Choosing audience segmentation strategies and methods for health communication. In:  Maibach EW,  Parrott RL editor. Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1995;p. 186–198
38. Slater MD. Integrating application of media effects, persuasion and behavior change theories to communication campaigns: A stages of change framework. Health Commun. 1999;11:335–354
    • CrossRef
39. National Cancer Institute. Eat 5 to 9 a Day for Better Health Program Evaluation. Available at: http://5aday.gov/research/program.html. Accessed July 10, 2005.
40. In:  Kreuter M,  Farrell D,  Olevich L,  Brennan L editor. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000;p. 43–51
41. Weinreich NK. Hands-On Social Marketing: A Step-by-Step Guide. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1999;
42. Wallack L, Dorfman L, Jernigan D, Themba M. Media Advocacy and Public Health: Power for Prevention. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1993;
43. Brown V, Neumann C, Sander-Smith M, Snyder LB. Mid-term Evaluation: Wellstart International’s Expanded Promotion of Breastfeeding Program. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development, Division of Nutrition & Maternal Health, Office of Health & Nutrition; 1994;
44. Shimp T. Advertising, Promotion, and Supplemental Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications. 6th ed. Orlando, Fl: Harcourt; 2000;
45. Babor T, Ahmed K, McRee B. Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Toward a Public Health Approach to the Management of Substance Abuse. Manuscript.
46. Noar SM. A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: Where do we go from here?. J Health Commun. 2006;11:21–42
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
47. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Menlo Park, Calif: Addison-Wesley; 1975;
48. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986;
49. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing the Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. 2nd ed. Homewood, Ill: Dow Jones/Irwin; 1986;
50. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):282–298
    • MEDLINE
51. Maiman L, Becker MH. The health belief model: Origins and correlates in psychological theory. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:387–408
52. Pechmann C. A comparison of health communication models: risk learning versus stereotype priming. Media Psychology. 2001;3:189–210
53. Affenito SG, Thompson DR, Barton BA, et al. Breakfast consumption by African-American and white adolescent girls correlates positively with calcium and fiber intake and negatively with body mass index. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:938–945
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (126 KB)
    • CrossRef
54. Lang A. Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features & emotional content in TV commercials. Communic Res. 1990;17:275–299
55. Batra R, Ray ML. Affective response mediating acceptance of advertising. J Consum Res. 1986;13:234–249
56. Monahan JL. Thinking positively: Using positive affect when designing health messages. In:  Maibach EW,  Parrott RL editor. Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1995;p. 81–98
57. Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company; 1963;
58. Valente TW. Evaluating communication campaigns. In:  Rice RE,  Atkin CK editor. Public Communication Campaigns. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001;p. 105–124
59. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA. When evaluation design affects results: meta-analysis of evaluations of mediated health campaigns. New Orleans, La: Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication; 1999;
60. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1984-2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.htm.
61. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, Ga). Youth Risk Behavior Survey and Middle School Youth Behavior Survey; 1992-2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/yrbs/index.htm.
62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999-2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.
63. Brashers DE, Goldsmith DJ, Hsieh E. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Hum Commun Res. 2002;28:258–271
64. Shim M, Kelly B, Hornik R. Cancer scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening behavior. 2005;Presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. New York; May