Operation Frontline: Assessment of Longer-term Curriculum Effectiveness, Evaluation Strategies, and Follow-up Methods

References 

1. McClelland JW, Keenan DP, Lewis J, et al. Review of tools used to assess the impact of nutrition education on dietary intake and quality, weight management practices, and physical activity of low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ. 1995;33:S35–S48
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (126 KB)
   • CrossRef
2. Ammerman AS, Lindquist CH, Lohn KN, et al. The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med. 2002;35:25–41
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Contento IR, Balch GI, Bronner YL, et al. The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs, and research. J Nutr Educ. 1995;27:312–328
   • Full-Text PDF (2078 KB)
   • CrossRef
4. Havas S, Anliker J, Greenburg D, et al. Final results of the Maryland WIC Food For Life program. Prev Med. 2003;37:406–416
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Arnold CG, Sobal J. Food practices and nutrition knowledge after graduation from the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP). J Nutr Educ. 2000;32:130–138
   • Abstract
   • Full-Text PDF (1057 KB)
   • CrossRef
6. Howard-Pitney B, Winkleby MA, Albright CL, et al. The Stanford Nutrition Action Program: a dietary fat intervention for low-literacy adults. Am J Public Health. 1997;87:1971–1976
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Taylor T, Serrano E, Anderson J, Kendall P. Knowledge, skills, and behavior improvements on peer educators and low-income Hispanic participants after a Stages of Change-based bilingual nutrition education program. J Community Health. 2000;25:241–262
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Share Our Strength: Operation Frontline. Available at: http://www.strength.org/what/-operationfrontline/. Accessed February 27, 2007.
9. Share Our Strength: Eating Right. Available at: http://www.strength.org/what/-operationfrontline/curricula. Accessed February 27, 2007.
10. Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS. Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Memphis, Tenn: Naval Technical Training, US Naval Air Station; 1975;Research Branch Report 8-75, Millington, Tenn:
11. Rogers CR, Freiberg HJ. Freedom to Learn. 3^rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994;
12. Nussbaum RJ. Operation Frontline program evaluation overview. Share Our Strength. 2004;1–8June
13. Ambrose K. An evaluation of Operation Frontline: Serviced community and impact. Available at: http://www.strength.org/what/operationfrontline/pdf/ Ambrose2006_OFL_Evaluation.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2007.
14. Sprangers M, Hoogstraten J. Pretesting effects in retrospective pretest-posttest designs. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74:265–272
    • CrossRef
15. Rohs FR, Lanone CA, Coleman RK. Response shift bias: a problem in evaluating nutrition training using self-report measures. J Nutr Edu. 2001;33:165–170
16. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 2^nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1988;
17. Lipski U, Igani E. In: Report #3: Evaluation of nutrition interventions: a background document. Ontario: Prevention Unit, Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care; 2001;p. 1–26for the, November
18. Rockwell SK, Kohn H. Post-then-pre evaluation: measuring behavior change more accurately. J Extension. 1989;27:1–7(serial online). Available at: http://www.joe.org/-joe/1989summer/a5html. Accessed February 27, 2007.
19. Hill LG, Betz DL. Revisiting the retrospective pretest. Am J Eval. 2005;26:501
20. Salant P, Dillman DA. How to Conduct Your Own Survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1994;