Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 80-88, March 2008

Dietary Change: What Are the Responses and Roles of Significant Others?

  • Judy Paisley, PhD, RD

      Affiliations

    • School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Judy Paisley, PhD, RD, School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON Canada M5B 2K3; Phone: (416) 979-5000 ext 6942; Fax: (416) 979-5204
  • ,
  • Heather Beanlands, PhD, RN

      Affiliations

    • School of Nursing, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Joanne Goldman, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Continuing Education and Professional Development, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Susan Evers, PhD, RD

      Affiliations

    • Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • ,
  • Janet Chappell, PhD, RD

      Affiliations

    • School of Nutrition, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract 

Objective

This study examined the impact of one person’s dietary change on the experiences of a significant other with whom they regularly shared meals.

Design

Qualitative constant comparison approach using semistructured interviews.

Setting

Community-based.

Participants

Forty-two participants were recruited using a stratified purposive sampling strategy.

Analysis

Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using NUD*IST, version 4.0 software (Qualitative Solutions and Research, Melbourne, Australia, 1997) and manual coding.

Results

Most dietary changers had modified their diets in response to a disease diagnosis (eg, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, hypoglycemia, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), ulcer, allergies). Others had changed their diets for personal reasons (eg, weight loss, vegetarian diets). The dietary changes included dietary fat reduction, conversion to vegetarian or vegan diets, restriction of total kilocalorie intake, and elimination or reduction of specific food items. Significant others described a range of emotional responses to the dietary change, including cooperation, encouragement, skepticism, and anger. Significant others’ descriptions of the roles that they played in the dietary change were positive (enabling), neutral (neither enabling nor inhibiting), or negative (inhibiting). Most significant others played positive roles; few played neutral or negative roles.

Conclusions and Implications

Understanding dietary change from the perspective of significant others can enable nutrition professionals to develop strategies to promote dietary modifications as a shared activity.

Key Words: dietary change, qualitative

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was funded by the Danone Institute, Quebec, Canada.

PII: S1499-4046(07)00693-8

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2007.04.374

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 40, Issue 2 , Pages 80-88, March 2008