Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 40, Issue 3 , Pages 134-143, May 2008

An Economic Evaluation of the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program

  • Jamie Dollahite, PhD, RD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Jamie Dollahite, PhD, RD, Division of Nutritional Sciences, 3M14 MVR, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; Phone: (607) 255-7715; Fax: (607) 255-0027
  • ,
  • Donald Kenkel, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Policy, Analysis, and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
  • ,
  • C. Scott Thompson, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Policy, Analysis, and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Abstract 

Objective

To evaluate the New York State Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program using economic methodology.

Design

Data were collected by nutrition educators in a pretest, posttest design with an epidemiological modeling approach to assess costs and estimate potential health benefits of the state program.

Setting

Cooperative Extension, 35 counties.

Participants

5730 low-income participants.

Intervention

Series of 6 or more food and nutrition lessons.

Main outcome measures

Cost (program and participant); health benefits in quality adjusted life years (QALYs); and monetized benefits: society's willingness to pay for QALYs, and benefits of avoiding or delaying health care costs and loss of productivity.

Analysis

Cost-effectiveness estimated from behavior change and QALY weights. Cost–benefit ratios estimated from costs and monetized benefits. Sensitivity analyses provided ranges where lack of agreement exists around parameters' values.

Results

Cost was $892/graduate. Cost-effectiveness was 245 QALYs saved, at $20863/QALY (sensitivity 42-935 QALYs, $5467-$130311 per QALY). Societal willingness to pay benefit-to-cost ratio was $9.58:$1.00 (sensitivity $1.44-$41.92:$1:00); narrow governmental benefit-to-cost ratio was $0.82:$1.00 (sensitivity $0.08-$4.33:$1:00).

Conclusions and implications

Outcome data indicate that food and nutrition behavior changes resulting from the Program are likely to improve future health and reduce health care costs. Cost-effectiveness is estimated to be as great as for many current health interventions.

Key Words: cost-benefit analysis, cost-effectiveness, evaluation studies, low-income population, nutrition education

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was supported by a USDA Research Development Grant from the Joint Center for Poverty Research (2000), the College of Human Ecology at Cornell University, and Cornell Cooperative Extension.

 Continuing Education Questionnaire available at www.sne.org/ Meets Learning Need Codes for RDs and DTRs 4010, 4070, and 4080.

PII: S1499-4046(07)00968-2

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2007.08.011

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 40, Issue 3 , Pages 134-143, May 2008