Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 41, Issue 4 , Pages 268-273, July 2009

Physical Activity Programming in Family Child Care Homes: Providers' Perceptions of Practices and Barriers

  • Bronwyn Fees, PhD

      Affiliations

    • School of Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Bronwyn Fees, PhD, School of Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; Phone: (785) 532-1476; Fax: (785) 532-5505
  • ,
  • Stewart Trost, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR
  • ,
  • Melissa Bopp, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
    • Community Health Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
  • ,
  • David A. Dzewaltowski, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
    • Community Health Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS

Abstract 

Objective

To examine family child care home (FCCH) providers' perceptions of appropriate physical activity (PA), current practices, and perceived barriers to inclusion of PA within their programs.

Design

A trained facilitator lead 4 focus group sessions of FCCH providers. Questions addressed providers' planning for PA, resources and barriers, and perceptions of children's engagement.

Setting

Family child care homes.

Participants

32 FCCH providers (100% female) caring for children 6 weeks to 5 years old in predominantly mixed-age programs.

Phenomenon of Interest

Types of and extent to which PA was offered for children and perceived barriers to PA in this setting.

Analysis

Authors coded and analyzed transcriptions based on a socioecological framework using qualitative data analysis software.

Results

Majority of providers reported running and dancing to music as the most common PA, generally in an unstructured context. Frequency varied from none to twice a day. Few providers reported planning intentionally for PA; any plans followed children's interests. Barriers to inclusion of PA included personal, programming, parent, environmental, and financial reasons. Providers requested training on PA, particularly ideas for experiences in mixed-age groups.

Conclusions and Implications

Type, frequency, consistency, and duration of PA among FCCH homes vary widely. Implications include training on PA and resources tailored to the unique characteristics of family child care homes.

Key Words: physical activity, child care, obesity, overweight, prevention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1499-4046(08)00021-3

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.01.013

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 41, Issue 4 , Pages 268-273, July 2009