Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 41, Issue 6 , Pages 398-405, November 2009

Tailoring Messages to Individual Differences in Monitoring-Blunting Styles to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake

  • Pamela Williams-Piehota, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Dr. Pamela Williams-Piehota, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194; Phone: (919) 316-3936; Fax: (919) 541-7384
  • ,
  • Amy E. Latimer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Nicole A. Katulak, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
  • ,
  • Ashley Cox, MS, JD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
  • ,
  • Stephanie A.N. Silvera, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ
  • ,
  • Linda Mowad, RN

      Affiliations

    • National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
  • ,
  • Peter Salovey, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprint requests: Dr. Peter Salovey, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 208205, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205; Phone: (203) 432-2902; Fax: (203) 432-2161

Abstract 

Objective

To examine whether messages matched to individuals' monitoring-blunting coping styles (MBCS) are more effective in increasing fruit and vegetable intake than mismatched messages. MBCS refers to the tendency to either attend to and amplify, or distract oneself from and minimize threatening information.

Design/Setting

Randomly assigned messages were tailored to resonate with either monitors or blunters and delivered at baseline, 1 week, 2 months, and 3 months later. Surveys were conducted at baseline and 2 and 4 months later.

Participants

531 callers to a cancer information hotline who did not meet the 5 A Day guideline.

Intervention

A brief telephone-delivered message and 3 mailings of booklets and promotional items encouraging fruit and vegetable intake, tailored for either monitors or blunters.

Main Outcome Measure

Fruit and vegetable intake 2 and 4 months post-baseline.

Analysis

Hierarchical regression modeling.

Results

Messages matched to MBCS were more effective than mismatched messages, particularly for the monitor message, in increasing intake at 2 months but not at 4 months.

Conclusions and Implications

These minimal interventions influenced fruit and vegetable intake. MBCS may be a promising target for developing tailored messages aimed at increasing intake, although additional research is needed to verify the robustness of these findings.

Key Words: persuasive communication, nutrition education, tailoring, monitor, coping styles

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 25.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Continuing Education Questionnaire available at www.sne.org/ Meets Learning Need Codes for RDs and DTRs 5150, 6020, and 6030.

 Research reported in this article was funded by the National Cancer Institute through a grant to Peter Salovey (R01-CA68427) and a contract to the Yale Cancer Center (NO2-CO-01002-75).

PII: S1499-4046(08)00707-0

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.006

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 41, Issue 6 , Pages 398-405, November 2009