Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 41, Issue 6 , Pages 398-405 , November 2009

Tailoring Messages to Individual Differences in Monitoring-Blunting Styles to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Intake

  • Pamela Williams-Piehota, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Dr. Pamela Williams-Piehota, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194; Phone: (919) 316-3936; Fax: (919) 541-7384
    • ,
  • Amy E. Latimer, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
    • ,
  • Nicole A. Katulak, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • ,
  • Ashley Cox, MS, JD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • ,
  • Stephanie A.N. Silvera, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ
    • ,
  • Linda Mowad, RN

      Affiliations

    • National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
    • ,
  • Peter Salovey, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for reprint requests: Dr. Peter Salovey, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 208205, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8205; Phone: (203) 432-2902; Fax: (203) 432-2161

References 

  1. Stewart BW, Kleihues P. World Health Organization World Cancer Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003;
  2. Heimendinger J, Van Duyn MA, Chapelsky D, Foerster S, Stables G. The national 5 A Day for Better Health Program: a large-scale nutrition intervention. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1996;2:27–35
  3. Casagrande SS, Wang Y, Anderson C, Gary TL. Have Americans increased their fruit and vegetable intake? the trends between 1988 and 2002. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32:257–263
  4. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:1028S–1034S
  5. Updegraff JA, Sherman DK, Luyster FS, Mann TL. The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2007;43:249–257
  6. Petty RE, Wegener DT. Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. In:  Gilbert D,  Fiske S,  Lindsay G editor. The Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1998;p. 323–390
  7. Brug J, Steenhuis I, Van Assema P, Glanz K, De Vries H. Computer-tailored nutrition education: differences between two interventions. Health Educ Res. 1999;14:249–256
  8. Marcus AC, Heimendinger J, Wolfe P, et al. A randomized trial of a brief intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake: a replication study among callers to the CIS. Prev Med. 2001;33:204–216
  9. Williams-Piehota P, Pizarro J, Mowad L, Mowad L, Salovey P. Need for cognition and message complexity in motivating fruit and vegetable intake among callers to the Cancer Information Service. Health Commun. 2006;19:75–84
  10. Campbell MK, DeVellis BM, Strecher VJ, Ammerman AS, DeVellis RF, Sandler RS. Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:783–787
  11. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P, de Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med. 1996;25:236–242
  12. Quintiliani LM, Carbone ET. Impact of diet-related cancer prevention messages written with cognitive and affective arguments on message characteristics, stage of change, and self-efficacy. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005;37:12–19
  13. Cantor N, Kihlstrom JF. Personality and Social Intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1987;
  14. Miller SM. Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987;52:345–353
  15. Miller SM. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease—implications for cancer screening and management. Cancer. 1995;76:167–177
  16. Koo M, Krass I, Aslani P. Enhancing patient education about medicines: factors influencing reading and seeking of written medical information. Health Expect. 2006;9:174–187
  17. Miller SM, Fang CY, Diefenbach MA, Bales C. Tailoring psychosocial interventions to the individual's health information-processing style. In:  Baum A,  Anderson B editor. Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001;
  18. Miller SM, Rodoletz M, Mangan CE, Schroeder CM, Sedlacek TV. Applications of the monitoring process model to coping with severe long-term medical threats. Health Psychol. 1996;15:216–225
  19. Wakefield CE, Homewood J, Mahmut M, Taylor A, Meiser B. Usefulness of the Threatening Medical Situations Inventory in individuals considering genetic testing for cancer risk. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69:29–38
  20. Miller SM, Shoda Y, Hurley K. Applying cognitive-social theory to health-protective behavior: breast self-examination in cancer screening. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:70–94
  21. Miller SM, Roussi P, Altman D, Helm W, Steinberg A. Effects of coping style on psychological reactions of low-income, minority women to colposcopy. J Reprod Med. 1994;39:711–718
  22. Williams-Piehota P, Pizarro J, Schneider TR, Mowad L, Salovey P. Matching health messages to monitor-blunter coping styles to motivate screening mammography. Health Psychol. 2005;24:58–67
  23. Salovey P, Williams-Piehota P. Field experiments in social psychology: message framing and the promotion of health protective behaviors. Am Behav Scientist. 2004;47:488–505
  24. Squiers L, Treiman K. The cancer information service research agenda. NIH publication 05-5311. Available at: http://cis.nci.nih.gov/research/agenda_book.pdf. Published 2005. Accessed September 14, 2009.
  25. Leader JK, Thompson B, Kristal AR, et al. Take Five - A Guide to Healthful Eating. Seattle, WA: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; 1994;
  26. Marcus AC, Morra M, Rimer BK, et al. A feasibility test of a brief intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the Cancer Information Service. Prev Med. 1998;27:250–261
  27. Block G, Hartman AM, Dresser CM, Carroll MD, Gannon J, Gardner L. A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:453–469
  28. Williams-Piehota P, Cox A, Navarro S, et al. Casting health messages in terms of responsibility for dietary change: promoting fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004;36:114–120
  29. Wallston KA. Hocus-pocus, the focus isn't strictly on locus: Rotter's social learning theory modified for health. Cognit Ther Res. 1992;16:183–199
  30. Heimendinger J, O'Neil C, Marcus A, et al. Multiple tailored messages are effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among callers to the cancer information service. J Health Commun. 2005;10(suppl 1):65–82
  31. Marlowe D, Crowne DP. Social desirability and response to perceived situational demands. J Consult Psychol. 1961;25:109–115
  32. Hebert JR, Peterson KE, Hurley TG, et al. The effect of social desirability trait on self-reported dietary measures among multi-ethnic female health center employees. Ann Epidemiol. 2001;11:417–427
  33. Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2003;
  34. Smith AF, Thompson FE, Subar AF, et al. Social desirability, social approval, and reports of food frequency. Paper presented at: the Third International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods; May 1998; Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  35. Van Zuuren FJ, Wolfs HM. Styles of information seeking under threat: personal and situational aspects of monitoring and blunting. Pers Individ Dif. 1991;12:141–149

 Continuing Education Questionnaire available at www.sne.org/ Meets Learning Need Codes for RDs and DTRs 5150, 6020, and 6030.

 Research reported in this article was funded by the National Cancer Institute through a grant to Peter Salovey (R01-CA68427) and a contract to the Yale Cancer Center (NO2-CO-01002-75).

PII: S1499-4046(08)00707-0

doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.006

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 41, Issue 6 , Pages 398-405 , November 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution