Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 44, Issue 1 , Pages 36-45, January 2012

Impact of a Community-based Intervention on Serving and Intake of Vegetables among Low-income, Rural Appalachian Families

  • Tionni R. Wenrich, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
  • ,
  • J. Lynne Brown, PhD, RD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: J. Lynne Brown, PhD, RD, Pennsylvania State University, 219 Food Science Bldg, University Park, PA 16802; Phone: (814) 863-3973; Fax: (814) 863-6132
  • ,
  • Robin Taylor Wilson, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
    • Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA
  • ,
  • Eugene J. Lengerich, VMD, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA
    • Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA

published online 24 October 2011.

Abstract 

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based intervention promoting the serving and eating of deep-orange, cruciferous, and dark-green leafy vegetables.

Design

Randomized, parallel-group, community-based intervention with a baseline/postintervention/3-month follow-up design.

Setting and Participants

Low-income food preparers (n = 50) and their partners (n = 50) in rural Appalachia Pennsylvania.

Intervention

Experimental food preparers attended 8 weekly interactive lessons; control food preparers received 8 weekly mailings that included similar recipes and handouts.

Main Outcome Measures

Target vegetable intake and frequency of serving by experimental and control treatment groups and by high and low meal diary scores, a measure of recipe acceptability.

Analysis

Linear mixed-model analysis with repeated measures.

Results

No significant differences resulted between the original experimental and control treatment groups. When grouped by high and low meal diary scores, more experimental families had high scores than in controls. High scores were associated with significant changes in frequency of serving and intake of the target vegetables.

Conclusions and Implications

Meal diary use may foster food preparer negotiation with partners and children to become involved in vegetable dish evaluation. Tools to help the trained food preparer draw family members into recipe evaluation, such as the meal diary, are useful and needed.

Key Words: vegetable intake, family meals, community-based intervention, low income, Appalachia

 

PII: S1499-4046(11)00344-7

doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2011.04.012

Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume 44, Issue 1 , Pages 36-45, January 2012