Consumers’ Ability to Perform Tasks Using Nutrition Labels

References

1. • Guthrie J.F.
   • Fox J.J.
   • Cleveland L.E.
   • Welsh S.
   Who uses nutrition labeling, and what effects does label use have on diet quality?.
   J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27: 163-172
   • Google Scholar
2. • Mueller W.
   Who reads the label?.
   Am Demographics. 1991; (Jan): 36-41
   • Google Scholar
3. • Food Drug Administration
   Regulations for the enforcement of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; nutrition labeling.
   Fed Reg. 1973; 38: 2125-2132
   • Google Scholar

4. Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990. Public Law 101-535, 104 Stat. 2353 (1990).

   • Google Scholar
5. • Food Drug Administration
   Food labeling; final rules.
   Fed Reg. 1993; 58: 2066-2941
   • Google Scholar
6. • Shank F.R.
   The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990.
   Food and Drug Law J. 1992; 47: 247-252
   • Google Scholar
7. • Bettman J.R.
   • Payne J.W.
   • Staelin R.
   Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information.
   J Public Policy and Marketing. 1986; 5: 1-28
   • Google Scholar
8. • Fanelli M.T.
   • Abernathy M.M.
   A nutritional questionnaire for older adults.
   The Gerontologist. 1990; 26: 192-197
   • Google Scholar
9. • Institute of Medicine
   Nutrition labeling: issues and directions for the 1990s.
   National Academy Press, Washington, DC1990
   • Google Scholar

10. Klinger LE. Nutrition labeling: cost vs. consumer interest. Presented to: Institute of Food Technologists, New York Section, September 18,1973.

    • Google Scholar
11. • Lenahan R.J.
    • Thomas J.A.
    • Taylor D.A.
    • et al.
    Consumer reaction to nutrition information on food product labels.
    Agricultural Economics. 1972; 2: 1-27
    • Google Scholar
12. • McCullum C.
    • Achterberg C.L.
    Food shopping and label use behavior among high school adolescents.
    Adolescence. 1997; 32: 181-196
    • Google Scholar
13. • Perez J.
    The product labeling controversy.
    Food Drug Cosmetic Law J. 1981; (July): 381-392
    • Google Scholar
14. • Rudd J.
    • Glanz K.
    How individuals use information for health action: consumer information processing.
    in: Glanz K. Lewis F.M. Rimer B.K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco1990: 115-132
    • Google Scholar
15. • Stokes R.C.
    • Haddock R.
    Interim report of the first two phases of the CRI/FDA nutrition labeling research program.
    Consumer Research Institute, Washington, DC1972
    • Google Scholar

16. Food and Drug Administration and International Food Information Council. The new food label: there's something in it for everybody. Washington, DC: IFIC Foundation, 1994.

    • Google Scholar
17. • Liebman B.
    What's in a label?.
    Nutrition Action Healthletter. 1994; (April): 5
    • Google Scholar
18. • Sugar
    • Association
    How high is your label IQ?.
    On Your Mark. 1997; (April): 6
    • Google Scholar

19. United States Department of Agriculture. The food label, the pyramid, and you. Washington, DC, 1994.

    • Google Scholar

20. National Food Processors Association/M/A/R/C. Food industry labeling study: an assessment of alternative label formats. Washington, DC: 1992.

    • Google Scholar

21. Derby BM. Nutrient and health claims on the food label: a consumer perspective. Presented at the Society for Nutrition Education Meetings, Washington, DC: July 19,1995.

    • Google Scholar
22. • Schwartz N.E.
    Communicating nutrition and dietetics issues: balancing diverse perspectives.
    J Am Diet Assoc. 1996; 96: 1137-1139
    • Google Scholar
23. • Contento I.
    • Balch G.I.
    • Bronner Y.L.
    • et al.
    Theoretical frameworks or models for nutrition education.
    J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27: 287-290
    • Google Scholar
24. • Bettman J.R.
    • Kakkar P.
    Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies.
    J Consumer Res. 1977; 3: 233-240
    • Google Scholar
25. • Levy A.S.
    • Matthews O.
    • Stephenson M.
    • et al.
    The impact of a nutrition information program on food purchases.
    J Public Policy and Marketing. 1985; 4: 1-13
    • Google Scholar
26. • Mazis M.B.
    • Staelin R.
    Using information processing principles in public policymaking.
    J Public Policy and Marketing. 1982; 1: 3-14
    • Google Scholar
27. • Muller T.E.
    Structural information factors which stimulate the use of nutrition information.
    J Marketing Res. 1985; 22: 143-157
    • Google Scholar
28. • Russo J.E.
    • Staelin R.
    • Nola C.A.
    • et al.
    Nutrition information in the supermarket.
    J Consumer Res. 1986; 13: 48-70
    • Google Scholar
29. • Scammon L.
    Information load and consumers.
    J Consumer Res. 1978; 4: 148-155
    • Google Scholar
30. • Bettman J.R.
    • Park C.W.
    Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis.
    J Consumer Res. 1980; 7: 234-248
    • Google Scholar
31. • Brucks M.
    • Mitchell A.A.
    • Staelin R.
    The effects of nutritional information disclosure in advertising: an information processing approach.
    J Public Policy and Marketing. 1984; 3: 1-25
    • Google Scholar
32. • Jacoby J.
    • Chestnut R.W.
    • Silberman W.
    Consumer use and comprehension of nutrition information.
    J Consumer Res. 1977; 4: 119-128
    • Google Scholar
33. • Johnson E.J.
    • Russo J.E.
    Product familiarity and learning new information.
    J Consumer Res. 1984; 11: 542-550
    • Google Scholar
34. • Fiske S.T.
    • Taylor S.E.
    Social cognition.
    McGraw-Hill, New York1991
    • Google Scholar
35. • Schneider D.J.
    Social cognition.
    Ann Rev Psychol. 1991; 42: 527-561
    • Google Scholar

36. Baumgardner MH, Heimbach JT, Stokes RC. FDA 1978 consumer food labeling survey: demographic analysis of survey responses. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Consumer Studies Branch, 1980.

    • Google Scholar
37. • Cole C.A.
    • Balasubramanian S.K.
    Age differences in consumers’ search for information: public policy implications.
    J Consumer Res. 1993; 20: 157-169
    • Google Scholar
38. • Cole C.A.
    • Gaeth G.J.
    Cognitive and age-related differences in the ability to use nutritional information in a complex environment.
    J Marketing Res. 1990; 27: 175-184
    • Google Scholar

39. Heimbach JT. Public understanding of food label information. Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Consumer Studies Branch, 1982.

    • Google Scholar
40. • Mohr K.G.
    • Wyse B.W.
    • Hansen R.G.
    Aiding consumer nutrition decisions: comparison of a graphical nutrient density labeling format with the current food labeling system.
    Home Economics Res J. 1980; 8: 162-172
    • Google Scholar
41. • Moorman C.
    The effects of stimulus and consumer characteristics on the utilization of nutrition information.
    J Consumer Res. 1990; 17: 362-374
    • Google Scholar
42. • Scott V.
    • Worsley A.F.
    Ticks, claims, tables and food groups: a comparison for nutrition labelling.
    Health Promotion Int. 1994; 9: 27-37
    • Google Scholar
43. • Spotts Jr., H.E.
    • Schewe C.D.
    Communicating with the elderly consumer: the growing health care challenge.
    J Health Care Marketing. 1989; 9: 36-44
    • Google Scholar
44. • Vandenberg R.J.
    Food label information: what consumers say they use and what they actually use.
    Adv Consumer Res. 1981; 8: 484-487
    • Google Scholar
45. • Levy A.S.
    • Fein S.B.
    • Schucker R.E.
    More effective nutrition label for mats are not necessarily more preferred.
    J Am Diet Assoc. 1992; 92: 1230-1234
    • Google Scholar
46. • Levy A.S.
    • Fein S.B.
    • Schucker R.E.
    Performance characteristics of seven nutrition label formats.
    J Public Policy and Marketing. 1996; 15: 1-15
    • Google Scholar
47. • Cowan C.D.
    Mall intercepts and clinical trials: the philosophy of inference from different types of research designs.
    Market Res. 1989; (March): 15-22
    • Google Scholar
48. • Derby B.M.
    • Fein S.B.
    Meeting the NLEA Education Challenge: a consumer research perspective.
    in: Shapiro R. The nutrition labeling handbook. Marcel Dekker Food Science and Technology Series, New York1995: 315-353
    • Google Scholar
49. • Black A.
    • Rayner M.
    Just read the label: understanding nutrition information in numeric, verbal, and graphic formats.
    The Coronary Prevention Group, HMSO, London1992
    • Google Scholar
50. • Glanz K.
    • Hewitt A.M.
    • Rudd J.
    Consumer behavior and nurition education: an integrative review.
    J Nutr Educ. 1992; 24: 267-277
    • Google Scholar
51. • Shannon B.
    Nutrition labelling: putting the consumer first.
    Br Food J. 1994; 96: 40-44
    • Google Scholar
52. • Daly P.A.
    The response of consumers to nutrition labeling.
    J Consumer Affairs. 1976; 10: 170-178
    • Google Scholar
53. • Klopp P.
    • MacDonald M.
    Nutrition labels: an exploratory study of consumer reasons for nonuse.
    J Consumer Affairs. 1981; 15: 301-316
    • Google Scholar
54. • Bryd-Bredbenner C.
    Designing a consumer friendly nutrition label.
    J Nutr Educ. 1994; 26: 180-190
    • Google Scholar
55. • Cronin F.
    • Achterberg C.
    SNE Comments on the FDA Proposed Nutrition Label Format Regulations.
    J Nutr Educ. 1992; 24: 280-284
    • Google Scholar
56. • Gillespie A.H.
    A survey of nutritionists’ opinions on objectives of a dietary guidance system.
    J Nutr Educ. 1987; 19: 220-224
    • Google Scholar
57. • Kennedy E.
    • Meyers L.
    • Layden W.
    The 1995 Dietary Guidelines for Americans: an overview.
    J Am Diet Assoc. 1996; 96: 234-237
    • Google Scholar