Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 3, P140-150, May 2002

Download started.

Ok

Role of Food Prepared Away from Home in the American Diet, 1977-78 versus 1994-96: Changes and Consequences

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To examine changes, between 1977-78 and 1994-96, in the quantity and quality of food Americans consumed that was prepared at home versus away from home.

      Design

      Data were obtained from nationwide surveys of food consumption conducted by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) in 1977-78 and 1994-96. To maximize comparability, we used “day 1” dietary data, which both surveys collected via 24-hour recall.

      Subjects/Settings

      Individuals 2 years of age and over were selected. USDA sampling weights were used to generate nationally representative estimates.

      Variables Measured

      We categorized foods by preparation at home or at restaurants, fast-food establishments, schools/day care, and other non-home locations. We assessed percent calories from total fat and saturated fat, and the cholesterol, sodium, fiber, calcium, and iron densities of foods prepared at home versus those prepared away from home.

      Statistical Analyses

      T tests were calculated using accepted procedures to adjust for survey design effects.

      Results

      Between 1977-78 and 1994-96, consumption of food prepared away from home increased from 18% to 32% of total calories. Meals and snacks based on food prepared away from home contained more calories per eating occasion, and “away” food was higher in total fat and saturated fat on a per-calorie basis than at-home food. “Away” food contained less dietary fiber, calcium, and iron on a per-calorie basis. Among adults but not children, food prepared away from home was more sodium and cholesterol dense.

      Implications

      When developing intervention messages and strategies, nutrition educators need to be aware of the increasing role of “away” food in Americans' diets.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bowers DE
        Cooking trends echo changing roles of women.
        FoodReview. 2000; 23: 23-29
        • Jekanowski MD
        Causes and consequences of fast food sales growth.
        FoodReview. 1999; 22: 11-16
        • Clauson A
        Spotlight on national food spending.
        FoodReview. 2000; 23: 15-17
        • Hayge HV
        Developments in women's labor force participation.
        Monthly Labor Rev. 1997; 120: 41-46
        • Chern WS
        • Lee H-J
        Relationships between food away from home and food at home: policy implications.
        in: Jensen HH Chalfant JA Policy Implications for U.S. Agriculture of Changes in Demand for Food. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Ames, Iowa1994: 143-152
      1. Consumer corner: what you should know about dual-income households. Supermarket Research Report.
        (Accessed January 12, 1999)
        • Jakle JA
        • Sculle KA
        Fast Food. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md1999
      2. The background of Burger King corporation.
        (Accessed September 11, 2000)
        • Mills S
        Tracking takeout. Restaurants USA.
        (Accessed October 11, 2000)
        • Bunch K
        • Hall L
        Factors Affecting Nutrient Consumption. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY1983 (Agricultural Economics Report No. 22)
        • Ries CP
        • Kline K
        • Weaver SO
        Impact of commercial eating on nutrient adequacy.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1987; 87: 463-468
        • Haines PS
        • Hungerford DW
        • Popkin BM
        • Guilkey DK
        Eating patterns and energy and nutrient intakes of U.S. women.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1992; 92 (707): 698-704
        • Clemens LHE
        • Slawson DL
        • Klesges RC
        The effect of eating out on quality of diet in premenopausal women.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1999; 99: 442-444
        • Guthrie JF
        Dietary patterns and personal characteristics of women consuming recommended amounts of calcium.
        Fam Econ Nutr Rev. 1996; 9: 33-49
        • Interagency Board for Nutrition Monitoring and Related Research
        Third report on nutrition monitoring in the United States, executive summary. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC1995
        • Guenther PM
        • Perloff BP
        Effects of procedural differences between 1977 and 1987 in the Nationwide Food Consumption Survey on estimates of food and nutrient intakes: results of the USDA 1988 Bridging Study. US Dept of Agriculture, Hyattsville, Md1990 (NFCS Rep No.87-M-1)
        • US Dept of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS Food Surveys Research Group
        Data and documentation for the 1994-96 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII)-Diet and Health Knowledge Survey (DHKS) [data on CD-ROM]. US Dept of Agriculture, Riverdale, Md1998 (National Technical Information Service Accession No. PB98-500457)
        • Life Sciences Research Office
        Guidelines for Use of Dietary Intake Data. Federation of the American Societies for Experimental Biology, Bethesda, Md1986
        • US Dept of Agriculture and US Dept of Health and Human Services
        Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 5th ed. USDA, Washington, DC2000 (Home and Garden Bulletin no. 232)
        • Krebs-Smith SM
        • Kott PS
        • Guenther PM
        Mean proportion and population proportion: two answers to the same question?.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1989; 89: 671-676
        • Shah BV
        • Barnwell BG
        • Hunt PN
        • LaVange LM
        SUDAAN User's Manual: Professional Software for Survey Data Analysis for Multi-stage Sample Designs. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC1991
        • Lutz SM
        • Hischman J
        • Smallwood DM
        National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program reforms: policy development and economic impacts.
        in: America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. US Dept of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC1999: 371-384 (Agriculture Information Bulletin no. 750)
        • National Institutes of Health
        Optimal calcium intakes.
        NIH Consens Statement. 1994; 12: 1-31
        • Lin B-H
        • Guthrie JF
        • Blaylock J
        The Diets of America's Children: Influence of Dining Out, Household Characteristics, and Nutrition Knowledge. US Dept of Agriculture, Washington, DC1996 (Agricultural Economics Report no. 746)
        • Levine EL
        • Guthrie JF
        Nutrient intakes and eating patterns of teenagers.
        Fam Econ Nutr Rev. 1997; 10: 20-35
        • Food and Nutrition Board, Subcommittee on the Tenth Edition of the RDAs
        Recommended Dietary Allowances. 10th Ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC1989
        • Mertz W
        • Trui JC
        • Judd JT
        • et al.
        What are people really eating? The relation between energy intake derived from estimated diet records and intake determined to maintain body weight.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1991; 54: 291-295
        • Jeffery RW
        • French SA
        Epidemic obesity in the United States: are fast foods and television viewing contributing?.
        Am J Public Health. 1998; 88: 277-280
        • McCrory MA
        • Fuss PJ
        • Hays NP
        • Vinken AG
        • Greenberg AS
        • Roberts SB
        Overeating in America: association between restaurant food consumption and body fatness in healthy adult men and women ages 19 to 80.
        Obes Res. 1999; 7: 564-571
        • Purath J
        • Lansinger T
        • Ragheb C
        Cardiac risk evaluation for elementary school children.
        Public Health Nurs. 1995; 12: 189-195
        • Roberts SB
        • Pi-Sunyer FX
        • Dreher M
        • et al.
        Physiology of fat replacement and fat reduction: effects of dietary fat and fat substitutes on energy regulation.
        Nutr Rev. 1998; 56: S29-S49
        • Rolls BJ
        • Engell D
        • Birch LL
        Serving portion size influences 5-year-old but not 3-year-old children's food intakes.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2000; 100: 232-234
        • Young LR
        • Nestle M
        Portion sizes in dietary assessment: issues and policy implications.
        Nutr Rev. 1995; 53: 149-158
        • Rodin J
        Social and immediate environmental influences on food selection.
        Int Obes. 1980; 4: 364-370
      3. Foodservice trends.
        Restaurants USA. 1998; 18: 39-46
        • Dalton SS
        • Linke RA
        • Simko MD
        Worksite food choices: an investigation of intended and actual selections.
        J Nutr Educ. 1986; 18: 182-187
        • Parseghian P
        Diners talk healthy but eat traditionally.
        Restaurant News. 1992; 19: 7
        • Lewis NM
        • Hollingsworth M
        Food choices of young college women consuming low- or moderate-calcium diets.
        Nutr Res. 1992; 12: 943-948
        • Gleason PM
        Participation in the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 1995; 61: 213S-220S
        • Guthrie JF
        • Derby BM
        • Levy AS
        What people know and don't know about nutrition.
        in: America's Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. US Dept of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC1999: 243-280 (Agricultural Information Bulletin no. 750)
        • Kurtzweil P
        Today's special: nutrition information.
        FDA Consumer. 1997; 31: 21-25
        • Almanza BA
        • Nelson D
        • Chai S
        Obstacles to nutrition labeling in restaurants.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1997; 97: 157-161
        • Apfel I
        Menu review.
        Restaurants USA. 1998; 18: 10-12
      4. The 1997 Better Health Restaurant Challenge.
        Community Nutritionary. 1998; 1: 7-8