This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Development of an evaluation tool of psychosocial constructs for use by participants in 2 federal programs, Food Stamp Nutrition Education and the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program.
Cross-sectional data from a longitudinal study.
Limited-resource women (n = 111) living in low-income communities.
Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, ethnic differences, convergent validity.
Spearman rank order correlation, analysis of variance, principal components analysis.
Reliability coefficients ranged from a low of r = .18 (not significant) to r = .74 (P < .0001). Two items were deleted for not meeting criteria for reliability and 2 for redundancy. Ethnic differences at baseline were significant for 1 item. Domain constructs loaded on 4 to 5 factors for the biopsychosocial framework. Estimates of convergent validity of 9 constructs led to the deletion of 3 (ie, perceived barriers, social support, and perceived norms), with retention of perceived benefits, perceived control, self-efficacy, readiness to eat more fruit, readiness to eat more vegetables, and perceived diet quality. As an estimate of convergent validity, the final version of the tool with 6 constructs remaining showed significant correlations with indicators of diet quality: serum carotenoid values (r = .38, P < .001); hypothesized nutrients calculated from the mean of 3 24-hour dietary recalls (vitamin C, r = .47, P < .0001; vitamin A, r = .39, P < .0001; folate, r = .37, P < .0001; beta-carotene, r = .31, P < .001; and fiber, r = .46, P < .0001); fruit and vegetable servings (r = 0.55, P < .0001); Healthy Eating Index (r = .27, P < .05); and a fruit and vegetable behavioral scale (r = .60, P < .0001).
Conclusion and Implications
This systematic process yielded a fruit and vegetable evaluation tool useful for practitioners and researchers. This is the first validation study of this type to estimate convergent validity with 5 indicators of diet quality, including a biomarker.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
SNEB Member LoginSNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Fruit, vegetables and antioxidants in childhood and risk of adult cancer: the Boyd Orr cohort.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003; 57: 218-225
- Associations of whole-grain, refined-grain, and fruit and vegetable consumption with risks of all-cause mortality and incident coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.Am J Clin Nutr. 2003; 78: 383-390
- The causes and prevention of cancer.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92: 5258-5265
- EFNEP Resources Page. Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service Web site.Accessed February 2, 2005)
- Review of evaluation tools used to assess the impact of nutrition education on dietary intake and quality, weight management practices, and physical activity of low-income audiences.J Nutr Educ. 2001; 33: S35-S48
- Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002; 34: 2025
- The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs, and research: a review of research.J Natr Educ. 1995; 27: 1-142
- Psychosocial correlates of dietary intake: advancing dietary intervention.Annu Rev Nutr. 1999; 19: 17-40
- Development and validation of measures of psychosocial factors influencing fat- and fiber-related dietary behavior.Prev Med. 1993; 22: 373-387
- The effect of the Maryland WIC 5-A-Day Promotion Program on participants' stages of change for fruit and vegetable consumption.Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27: 649-663
- Factors associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among women participating in WIC.J Am Diet Assoc. 1998; 98: 1151-1158
- Stages of change and psychosocial correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption among rural African American church members.Am J Health Promotion. 1998; 12: 185-191
- Psychosocial factors influencing low fruit and vegetable consumption.J Behav Med. 1994; 17: 361-374
- Stages of change for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption participating in the National 5-A-Day for Better Health studies.Health Educ Behav. 1999; 26: 513-534
- Psychosocial factors associated with fruit, and vegetable consumption.Am J Health Promotion. 1995; 2: 98-104
- Impact of worksite health promotion on stages of dietary change: the Working Well Trial.Health Educ Behav. 1998; 25: 448-463
- The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model.Am J Psychiatry. 1980; 137: 535-544
- A Behavioral Model of Families' Use of Health Services. University of Chicago Press, Center for Health Administration Studies, Chicago, Ill1968 (Research Series, No. 25)
- From intentions to action: a theory of planned behavior.in: Kuhle J Beckman J Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany1985: 11-39
- The Theory of Planned Behavior: review of its applications to health-related behaviors.Am J Health Promotion. 1996; 11: 87-98
- Changing to a low fat diet: attitudes and beliefs of UK consumers.Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993; 47: 361-373
- Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC1997 (NIH Publication, No. 97–3896)
- Factors affecting consumption of fruits and vegetables by low-income families.J Am Diet Assoc. 1994; 11: 1309-1311
- Cognitive Interviewing and Questionnaire Design: A Training Manual. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Md1994 (Working Paper Series, No. 7)
- Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice Hall, Newark, NJ1986
- Distinguishing perceptions of control from self-efficacy: predicting consumption of a lowfat diet using the Theory of Planned Behavior.J Appl Soc Psychol. 1999; 29: 72-90
- Dietary applications of the Stages of Change Model.J Am Diet Assoc. 1999; 99: 673-678
- Writing for Reading: Guide for Developing Print Materials in Nutrition for Low Literacy Adults. University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, Wisc1986
- Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif1996
- Introduction to Research in Education. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Fort Worth, Tex1985
- Nutrition knowledge, attitudes and perceived norms as correlates of selecting lowfat diets.Health Educ Res. 1990; 5: 467-477
- Methodological framework for assessing health indices.J Chron Dis. 1985; 38 (1): 27-36
- Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif1979
- Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Newark, NJ1991
- Coefficient alpha in the internal structure of tests.Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297-334
- Psychometic Theory. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY1994
- How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, Calif1995
- Selecting items for a food behavior checklist for a limited resource audience.J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003; 35: 69-82
- The multiple-pass approach for the 24-hour recall in the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) 1994–96 [abstract].Am J Clin Nutr. 1997; 65: 1316S
- Evaluation of validity of items for a food behavior checklist.J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101: 751-761
- Physiological and clinical significance of carotenoids.Int J Vitamin Nutr Res. 1998; 68: 349-353
- Macro and micromethods for the determination of serum vitamin A using trifluoroacetic acid.J Nutr. 1963; 79: 454-462
- Quasi-Experimental: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass1979
- Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally, Chicago, Ill1966
Funding for the study was provided by the Food and Nutrition Service, US Department of Agriculture, Grant #59-3198-6-046, and the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP).
© 2005 Society for Nutrition Education. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.