Pilot Study: EatFit Impacts Sixth Graders' Academic Performance on Achievement of Mathematics and English Education Standards



      Investigate the impact of a nutrition education program on student academic performance as measured by achievement of education standards.


      Quasi-experimental crossover-controlled study.


      California Central Valley suburban elementary school (58% qualified for free or reduced-priced lunch).


      All sixth-grade students (n = 84) in the elementary school clustered in 3 classrooms.


      9-lesson intervention with an emphasis on guided goal setting and driven by the Social Cognitive Theory.

      Main Outcome Measure

      Multiple-choice survey assessing 5 education standards for sixth-grade mathematics and English at 3 time points: baseline (T1), 5 weeks (T2), and 10 weeks (T3).


      Repeated measures, paired t test, and analysis of covariance.


      Changes in total scores were statistically different (P < .05), with treatment scores (T3 - T2) generating more gains. The change scores for 1 English (P < .01) and 2 mathematics standards (P < .05; P < .001) were statistically greater for the treatment period (T3 - T2) compared to the control period (T2 - T1).

      Conclusion and Implications

      Using standardized tests, results of this pilot study suggest that EatFit can improve academic performance measured by achievement of specific mathematics and English education standards. Nutrition educators can show school administrators and wellness committee members that this program can positively impact academic performance, concomitant to its primary objective of promoting healthful eating and physical activity.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.
      Join SNEB today online


      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Food Stamp Program. Food Stamp Nutrition Education Plan Guidance Federal Fiscal Year 2006. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

      2. California Department of Education. 2005 Academic Performance Index Base Report Information Guide. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

      3. California Department of Education. California State Board of Education Content Standards. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

        • Horowitz M.
        • Shilts M.K.
        • Townsend M.S.
        EatFit: a goal-oriented intervention that challenges middle school adolescents to improve their eating and fitness choices.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36: 43-44
        • Shilts M.K.
        • Townsend M.S.
        • Horowitz M.
        An innovative approach to goal setting for adolescents: guided goal setting.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36: 155-156
        • Horowitz M.
        • Shilts M.K.
        • Townsend M.S.
        Adapting a diet analysis program for an adolescent audience.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2005; 37: 43-44
        • Horowitz M.
        • Shilts M.K.
        • Lamp C.
        • Townsend M.S.
        A standards-driven evaluation of academic performance: an 8-step process for nutrition educators.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008; 40: 401-403
      4. California Department of Education. 2003-2006 California standards tests released test questions. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

        • Nitzke S.
        • Voichick J.
        Overview of reading and literacy research and applications in nutrition education.
        J Nutr Educ. 1992; 24: 261-266
        • Campbell D.T.
        • Stanley J.C.
        Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research.
        Rand McNally, Chicago1966
        • Taras H.
        Physical activity and student performance at school.
        J Sch Health. 2005; 75: 214-218
        • Taras H.
        Obesity and student performance at school.
        J Sch Health. 2005; 75: 291-295
        • Taras H.
        Nutrition and student performance at school.
        J Sch Health. 2005; 75: 199-213
        • Sallis J.F.
        • McKenzie T.L.
        • Kolody B.
        • Lewis M.
        • Marshall S.
        • Rosengard P.
        Effects of health-related physical education on academic achievement: Project SPARK.
        Res Q Exerc Sport. 1999; 70: 127-134
        • US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture
        Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 6th edition. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2005
        • US Department of Health and Human Services
        The surgeon general's call to action to prevent and decrease overweight and obesity.
        US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MD2001
      5. US Department of Education. Elementary and Secondary Education; Guidance on Standards, Assessments, and Accountability; Content and Performance Standards. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

      6. US Department of Education. Lead and manage my school: standards, assessment and accountability. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

      7. Johnson HL, US Department of Education. NCLB Policy Letters to States. Available at: Accessed January 7, 2009.

        • Shilts M.K.
        • Horowitz M.
        • Townsend M.S.
        Guided goal setting: effectiveness in a dietary and physical activity intervention with low-income adolescents.
        Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2009; 20: 111-122
        • Townsend M.S.
        • Johns M.
        • Shilts M.K.
        • Farfan-Ramirez L.
        Evaluation of a USDA nutrition education program for low-income youth.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 30-41