Abstract
Objective
Design
Setting
Participants
Phenomenon of Interest
Analysis
Results
Conclusions and Implications
Key Words
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessSNEB Member Login
SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and BehaviorReferences
- From “old school” to “farm-to-school”: neoliberalization from the ground up.Agric Human Values. 2006; 23: 401-415
- Preventing Childhood Obesity: Health in the Balance. National Academies Press, Washington2005
- The Role of Schools in Obesity Prevention.Future Child. 2006; 16: 109-142
- Nutrition Services and Foods and Beverages Available at School: Results from the School Health Policies and Programs Study 2006.J Sch Health. 2007; 77: 500-521
- Healthy Farms, Healthy Kids: Evaluating the Barriers and Opportunities for Farm-to-School Programs. Community Food Security Coalition, Venice, CA2001
- How Local Farmers and School Food Service Buyers Are Building Alliances. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Marketing Service, Washington, DC2000
- Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food and Community. Tufts University Press, Medford, MA2004
Hendrickson M, Heffernan WD. Concentration of Agricultural Markets. http://www.nfu.org/wp-content/2007-heffernanreport.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2009.
Kirschenmann F, Stevenson S, Buttel F, Lyson T, Duffy M. Why Worry About Agriculture of the Middle? http://www.agofthemiddle.org/papers/whitepaper2.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2009.
- Reflections on Nutritional Health and the Environment: The Journey to Sustainability.Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition. 2006; 1: 3-24
- Reconnecting Farmers and Citizens in the Food System.in: Lockeretz W. Visions of American Agriculture. Iowa State University, Ames1997: 47-57
National Farm-to-School Network. http://www.farmtoschool.org. Accessed September 11, 2009.
- Results from the 2004 Michigan Farm-to-School Survey.J Sch Health. 2006; 76: 169-174
- Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA2002
- Data Management and Analysis Methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA1994 (90-165)
- An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks1994
- Benefits and Obstacles to Purchasing Food from Local Growers and Producers.J Child Nutr Manag. 2002; 26: 1-7
Oklahoma Food Policy Council and Kerr Center for Sustainable Agriculture. The Oklahoma Farm-to-School Report Including the Oklahoma Institutional Food Service Survey. 2003.
Joshi A, Beery M. A Growing Movement: A Decade of Farm-to-School in California. http://departments.oxy.edu/uepi/publications/a_growing_movement.pdf. Accessed September 11, 2009.
- Minnesota-grown fruits and vegetables in K-12 schools: A feasibility study of the opportunities and barriers to great use of locally grown produce. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis2006
Izumi BT, Wright DW, Hamm MW. Farm to school programs: exploring the role of regionally-based food distributors in alternative agrifood networks [published online ahead of print July 26, 2009]. Agriculture and Human Values. doi: 10.1007/s10460-009-9221-x.
Article info
Footnotes
Dr. Izumi was affiliated with Michigan State University when this study was completed.
