Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 45, ISSUE 6, P499-509, November 2013

Download started.

Ok

Nutrition Educator Adoption and Implementation of an Experiential Foods Curriculum

Published:August 19, 2013DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2013.07.001

      Abstract

      Objective

      Describe changes in Nutrition Educator (NE) and Extension Agent (EA) motivation, self-efficacy, and behavioral capability over time after experiential food tasting curriculum training. Identify promoters of curriculum adoption, implementation, and future use.

      Design

      Mixed methods design including surveys, lesson implementation reports, and interviews.

      Setting

      New Mexico limited-resource schools.

      Participants

      Convenience sample of New Mexico Extension NE (n = 42) and their EA supervisors (n = 21).

      Intervention

      Three-hour curriculum training employing Social Cognitive Theory and Diffusion of Innovations.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Perceived change in motivation, self-efficacy, and behavioral capability from post-training through 8-month post-training; promoters and challenges to curriculum adoption, implementation, and future use.

      Analysis

      Repeated-measures ANOVA analyzed perceived behavior change over time. Significance was set at P ≤ .05. Qualitative responses were categorized by theme.

      Results

      Gains in NE motivation, self-efficacy, and behavioral capability were sustained at 8 months post-training. High adoption/implementation rates (79%) were attributed to strong implementation expectations, observational learning, experiential training elements, and perceived curriculum compatibility. Environmental factors including time constraints, personnel turnover, and scheduling conflicts proved challenging.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Maximizing curriculum simplicity and compatibility and incorporating behavioral capability, observational learning, and expectations into training support adoption and use. Adaptations and techniques to problem-solve challenges should be provided to new curricula implementers.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Dzewaltowski D.
        • Estabrooks P.
        • Klesges L.
        • Bull S.
        • Glasgow R.
        Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?.
        Health Promot Int. 2004; 19: 235-245
        • Brownson R.
        • Ballew P.
        • Brown K.
        • et al.
        The effect of disseminating evidence-based interventions that promote physical activity to health departments.
        Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 1900-1907
        • Hoelscher D.
        • Kelder S.
        • Murray N.
        • Cribb P.
        • Conroy J.
        • Parcel G.
        Dissemination and adoption of the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH): a case study in Texas.
        J Public Health Manage Practice. 2001; 7: 90-100
      1. Lee H, Contento I, Koch P, Barton A. Factors influencing implementation of nutrition education in the classroom: an analysis of observations in the Choice, Control, and Change (C3) Curriculum. Paper presented at the Society for Nutrition Education 2009 Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2009.

        • Franks A.
        • Kelder S.
        • Dino G.
        • et al.
        School-based programs: lessons learned from CATCH, Planet Health, and Not-On-Tobacco.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2007; 4: 1-9
        • McCullum-Gomez C.
        • Barroso C.
        • Hoelscher D.
        • Ward J.
        • Kelder S.
        Factors influencing implementation of the Coordinated Approach to Child Health (CATCH) Eat Smart school nutrition program.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 2039-2044
        • Nanney M.
        • Haire-Joshu D.
        • Brownson R.
        • Kostelc J.
        • Stephen M.
        • Elliott M.
        Awareness and adoption of a nationally disseminated dietary curriculum.
        Am J Health Behav. 2007; 31: 64-73
        • Serrano E.
        • Anderson J.
        • Chapman-Novakofski K.
        Not lost in translation: nutrition education, a critical component of translational research.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007; 39: 164-170
        • Glanz K.
        • Bishop D.
        The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 399-418
        • McAlister A.
        • Perry C.
        • Parcel G.
        How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: social cognitive theory.
        in: Glanz K. Rimer B. Viswanath K. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA2008: 169-188
        • Bandura A.
        Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.
        Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1986
        • Rogers E.
        Diffusion of Innovations.
        5th ed. Free Press, New York, NY2003
        • Hubbard W.
        • Sanmann L.
        Using Diffusion of Innovation concepts for improved program evaluation.
        Journal of Extension [Online]. 2007; 45 (Article 5FEA1) (Accessed July 30, 2013)
        • Walters L.
        • Stacey J.
        Focus on food: development of the Cooking With Kids experiential nutrition education curriculum.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009; 41: 371-373
        • Stacey J.
        • Walters L.
        Cooking With Kids Integrated Curriculum Guide. Cooking With Kids, Inc, Santa Fe, NM2009
      2. United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture. http://www.csrees.usda.gov/qlinks/extension.html. Accessed July 30, 2013.

        • Diker A.
        • Cunningham-Sabo L.
        • Bachman K.
        • Stacey J.
        • Walters L.
        • Wells L.
        Effective training design: use of theory and formative assessment.
        Health Promot Pract. 2012; 13: 496-505
        • Patton M.
        Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.
        3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2002
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power and Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ1988
        • Thomas D.
        A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.
        Am J Eval. 2006; 27: 237-246
        • Miles M.
        • Huberman A.
        Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook.
        2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA1994
        • Hsieh H.
        • Shannon S.
        Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
        Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288
        • Neuendorf K.
        The Content Analysis Guidebook.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2002
        • Harvey-Berino J.
        • Ewing J.
        • Flynn B.
        • Wick J.
        Statewide dissemination of a nutrition program: Show the Way to 5-A-Day.
        J Nutr Educ. 1998; 30: 29-36
        • Rohrbach L.
        • Graham J.
        • Hansen W.
        Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation.
        Prev Med. 1993; 22: 237-260
        • Hannon P.
        • Bowen D.
        • Christensen C.
        • Kuniyuki A.
        Disseminating a successful dietary intervention to faith communities: feasibility of using staff contact and encouragement to increase uptake.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008; 40: 175-180
        • Smith D.
        • Steckler A.
        • McCormick L.
        • McLeroy K.
        Lessons learned about disseminating health curricula to schools.
        J Health Educ. 1995; 26: 37-43
        • Davis M.
        • Baranowski T.
        • Resnicow K.
        • et al.
        Gimme 5 fruit and vegetables for fun and health: process evaluation.
        Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27: 167-176
        • Gittelsohn J.
        • Merkle S.
        • Story M.
        • et al.
        School climate and implementation of the Pathways study.
        Prev Med. 2003; 37: S97-S106
        • Levine E.
        • Olander C.
        • LeFebvre C.
        • Cusick P.
        • Biesiadecki L.
        • McGoldrick D.
        The Team Nutrition Pilot Study: lessons learned from implementing a comprehensive school-based intervention.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002; 34: 109-116
        • Owen N.
        • Glanz K.
        • Sallis J.
        • Kelder S.
        Evidence-based approaches to dissemination and diffusion of physical activity interventions.
        Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: S35-S44
        • Sy A.
        • Glanz K.
        Factors influencing teachers' implementation of an innovative tobacco prevention curriculum for multiethnic youth: Project SPLASH.
        J Sch Health. 2008; 78: 264-273
        • Lakshman R.
        • Sharp S.
        • Ong K.
        • Forouhi N.
        A novel school-based intervention to improve nutrition knowledge in children: cluster randomised controlled trial.
        BMC Public Health. 2010; 10: 123
        • Walton M.
        • Waiti J.
        • Signal L.
        • Thomson G.
        Identifying barriers to promoting healthy nutrition in New Zealand primary schools.
        Health Educ J. 2010; 69: 84-94