Advertisement
Research Brief| Volume 46, ISSUE 3, SUPPLEMENT , S71-S78, May 2014

Download started.

Ok

Satisfaction of California WIC Participants With Food Package Changes

      Abstract

      Objective

      Assess California Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participant satisfaction with the 2009 food package revisions and compare satisfaction based on language preference and timing of WIC enrollment relative to the revisions.

      Methods

      Computer-assisted telephone interviews of 2,996 WIC participants in 2010.

      Results

      Most participants (91.3%) were satisfied with checks for new WIC foods (fruits/vegetables, whole grains, and lower-fat milk) and 82.7% of participants were satisfied with amounts of foods that were reduced in the revised food package (milk, cheese, eggs, and juice). Difficulty using new checks was reported by 13.7% of participants. Compared with English-speaking participants, a higher percentage of Spanish speakers reported satisfaction (P < .01) and a lower percentage reported difficulties using checks (P < .001). A higher percentage of newer enrollees reported satisfaction compared with those participating in WIC before the revisions (P < .01).

      Conclusions and Implications

      This research suggests that recent policy change to the WIC food package improves WIC participant access to healthful food options without decreasing satisfaction.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Oliveira V, Frazao E. The WIC Program: Background, Trends, and Economic Issues, 2009 Edition. Economic Research Report No. 73, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. April 2009.

      2. California WIC Association. WIC Program at a Glance. http://www.calwic.org/about-us/wic-facts-and-figures. Accessed July 23, 2013.

        • Institute of Medicine
        • Committee to Review the WIC Food Packages and Food and Nutrition Board
        WIC Food Packages: Time for a Change.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2005
      3. WIC program data. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wicmain.htm. Accessed July 19, 2013.

        • Nestor B.
        • McKenzie J.
        • Hasan N.
        • AbuSabha R.
        • Achterberg C.
        Client satisfaction with the nutrition education component of the California WIC program.
        J Nutr Educ. 2001; 33: 83-94
      4. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Research and Analysis. National Survey of WIC Participants II Volumes I–IV. http://www.fns.usda.gov/ora/. Accessed July 23, 2013.

        • Ritchie L.
        • Whaley S.E.
        • Spector P.
        • Gomez J.
        • Crawford P.
        Favorable impact of nutrition education on California WIC participants.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42: S2-S10
        • Whaley S.E.
        • Ritchie L.D.
        • Spector P.
        • Gomez J.
        Revised WIC food package improves diets of WIC families.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44: 204-209
      5. PHFE-WIC. WIC Nutrition Education and Food Package Study (NEFPI) Time 3 Survey Instrument. http://www.phfewic.org/projects/files/WIC_Wave3Quex_Eng.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2013.

      6. California WIC Program. WIC Authorized Food List Shopping Guide. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/wicworks/WIC%20Foods/WICAuthorizedFoodListShoppingGuide-7-5-2011.pdf.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2014.

        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Ventura S.J.
        • Osterman M.J.
        • Wilson E.C.
        • Mathews T.J.
        Births: final data for 2010.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012; 61: 1-72
        • Gittelsohn J.
        • Laska M.N.
        • Andreyeva T.
        • et al.
        Small retailer perspectives of the 2009 Women, Infants and Children Program food package changes.
        Am J Health Behav. 2012; 36: 655-665
      7. Cole N, Hoaglin D, Kirlin J. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food, and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis Nutrition and Evaluation, National Survey of WIC Participants (2001 Final Report). http://www.fns.usda.gov/ora/menu/published/wic/FILES/WICSurvey.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2013.

        • Ayala G.X.
        • Laska M.N.
        • Zenk S.N.
        • et al.
        Stocking characteristics and perceived increases in sales among small food store managers/owners associated with the introduction of new food products approved by the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
        Public Health Nutr. 2012; 15: 1771-1779
        • Havens E.K.
        • Martin K.S.
        • Yan J.
        • Dauser-Forrest D.
        • Ferris A.M.
        Federal nutrition program changes and healthy food availability.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: 419-422