Advertisement
Research Brief| Volume 46, ISSUE 6, P621-626, November 2014

Download started.

Ok

Nutritional Comparison of Packed and School Lunches in Pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten Children Following the Implementation of the 2012–2013 National School Lunch Program Standards

      Abstract

      Objective

      Approximately 40% of children bring a packed lunch to school. Little is known about the quality of these lunches. This study examined the nutritional quality of packed lunches compared with school lunches for pre-kindergarten and kindergarten children after the implementation of 2012–2013 National School Lunch Program standards.

      Methods

      The researchers collected observational data for packed and school lunches from 3 schools in rural Virginia for 5 consecutive school days and analyzed them for macro and micro nutrients.

      Results

      Of the 1,314 observations collected; 42.8% were packed lunches (n = 562) and 57.2% were school lunches (n = 752). Energy, fat, saturated fat, sugar, vitamin C, and iron were significantly higher whereas protein, sodium, fiber, vitamin A, and calcium were significantly lower for packed lunches than school lunches.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Packed lunches were of less nutritional quality than school lunches. Additional research is needed to explore factors related to choosing packed over school lunches.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. US Department of Education. Back to school statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=372. Accessed January 15, 2014.

        • Johnson C.M.
        • Bednar C.
        • Kwon J.
        • Gustof A.
        Comparison of nutrient content and cost of home-packed lunches to reimbursable school lunch nutrient standards and prices.
        J Child Nutr Management. 2010; 33: 1-8
        • Ohri-Vachaspati P.L.
        • Turner L.
        • Chaloupka F.J.
        Fresh fruit and vegetable program participation in elementary schools in the United States and availability of fruits and vegetables in school lunch meals.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 921-926
        • Gordon A.R.
        • Cohen R.
        • Crepinsek M.K.
        • Fox M.
        • Hall J.
        • Zeidman E.
        The third school nutrition dietary assessment study: background and study design.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: S20-S30
      2. US Department of Agriculture. National School Lunch Program: total participation. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/01slfypart.htm. Accessed August 9, 2013.

      3. US Senate. 111th Congress. 3307, Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. 2010.

      4. Nutrition standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Program, final rule. 77 Federal Register 17 (January 26, 2012), pp. 4088–4167.

        • Briefel R.R.
        • Wilson A.
        • Gleason P.M.
        Consumption of low-nutrient, energy-dense foods and beverages at school, home, and other locations among school lunch participants and nonparticipants.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: S79-S90
        • Hur I.
        • Burgess-Champoux T.
        • Reicks M.
        Higher quality intake from school lunch meals compared with bagged lunches.
        ICAN. 2011; 3: 70-75
        • Johnston C.A.
        • Moreno J.P.
        • El-Mubasher A.
        • Woehler D.
        School lunches and lunches brought from home: a comparative analysis.
        Child Obesity. 2012; 8: 364-368
        • Lund S.M.
        Nutritional quality of elementary school student lunches in a Minnesota suburban school district. [dissertation].
        University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN2008
        • Melnik T.A.
        • Rhoades S.J.
        • Wales K.R.
        • Cowell C.
        • Wolfe W.S.
        Food consumption patterns of elementary schoolchildren in New York City.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1998; 98: 159-164
        • Rainville A.J.
        Nutritional quality of reimbursable school lunches compared to lunches brought from home in elementary schools in two southeastern Michigan districts.
        J Child Nutr Management. 2001; 25: 13-18
      5. US Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/51/51121.html. Accessed August 25, 2014.

        • Birch L.
        • Fisher J.O.
        Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents.
        Pediatrics. 1998; 101: 539-549
        • Gregory J.E.
        • Paxton S.J.
        • Brozovic A.M.
        Maternal feeding practices predict fruit and vegetable consumption in young children: results of a 12-month longitudinal study.
        Appetite. 2011; 57: 167-172
        • Singer M.R.
        • Moore L.L.
        • Garrahie E.J.
        • Ellison R.C.
        The tracking of nutrient intake in young children: the Framingham Children’s Study.
        Am J Public Health. 1995; 85: 1673-1677
        • Skinner J.D.
        • Carruth B.R.
        • Bounds W.
        • Ziegler P.J.
        Children’s food preferences: a longitudinal analysis.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2002; 102: 1638-1647
        • Richter S.L.
        • Vandervet L.M.
        • Macaskill L.A.
        • Salvadori M.I.
        • Seabrook J.A.
        • Dworatzek P.D.
        Accuracy and reliability of direct observations of home-packed lunches in elementary schools by trained nutrition students.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012; 112: 1603-1607
        • Gleason P.
        • Briefel R.
        • Wilson A.
        • Dodd A.H.
        School meal program participation and its association with dietary patterns and childhood obesity.
        US Dept of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Princeton, NJ2009 (Report No. 55)
        • Drewnowski A.
        • Bellisle F.
        Liquid calories, sugar, and body weight.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2007; 85: 651-661
        • Kant A.K.
        Reported consumption of low-nutrient-density foods by American children and adolescents: nutritional and health correlates, NHANES III, 1988 to 1994.
        Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003; 157: 789
        • Guenther P.M.
        • Dodd K.W.
        • Reedy J.
        • Krebs-Smith S.M.
        Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 1371-1379
        • Lorson B.A.
        • Melgar-Quinonez H.R.
        • Taylor C.A.
        Correlates of fruit and vegetable intakes in US children.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109: 474-478
        • Byker C.J.
        • Farris A.R.
        • Marcenelle M.
        • Davis G.C.
        • Serrano E.L.
        Food waste in a school nutrition program after implementation of new lunch program guidelines.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014 May 21; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.009
        • Ohri-Vachaspati P.
        Parental perception of the nutritional quality of school meals and its association with students’ school lunch participation.
        Appetite. 2014; 74: 44-47