Advertisement

Development and Validation of the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE): A Tool for Assessing the Quality of Proposed Nutrition Education Programs

Published:April 27, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2015.03.003

      Abstract

      Objective

      To develop and validate the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE), a checklist of research-based quality indicators for nutrition education programs.

      Design

      A prospective test of criterion validity and inter-rater reliability of a new tool comparing expert assessments and trained reviewer GENIE scores of the same nutrition education proposals.

      Participants

      Ten nutrition education experts; 13 volunteer reviewers.

      Variables Measured

      GENIE’s face, content, and criterion validity and inter-rater reliability compared using expert assessments and reviewer objective and subjective scores.

      Analysis

      Reviewer scores compared using Spearman correlation. Inter-rater reliability tested using intra-class correlation (ICC), Cronbach alpha, and ANOVA. Criterion validity tested using independent t test and point bi-serial correlation to compare reviewer with expert scores.

      Results

      Correlation found between total objective and total subjective scores. Agreement found between reviewers across proposals and categories considering subjective scores (F = 7.21, P < .001; ICC = 0.76 [confidence interval, 0.53–0.92]) and objective scores (F = 7.88, P < .001; ICC = 0.82 [confidence interval, 0.63–0.94]). Relationship was not significant (r = .564, P = .06) between expert and reviewer proposal scoring groups (high, medium, and low).

      Conclusions and Implications

      Results support the validity and reliability of GENIE as a tool for nutrition education practitioners, researchers, and program funding agencies to accurately assess the quality of a variety of nutrition program plans.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.
      Join SNEB today online

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brun J.
        Nutrition education: a model for effectiveness a synthesis of research.
        J Nutr Educ. 1985; 17 (ii–S44)
        • Ho M.
        • Garnett S.P.
        • Baur L.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in child obesity: systematic review with meta-analysis.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 130: e1647-e1671
        • Sims
        • Laura S.E.
        [Special issue].
        J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27: 284-286
        • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
        Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Standardized Language Committee. International Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology (IDNT) Reference Manual: Standardized Language for the Nutrition Care Process.
        4th ed. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, IL2013
        • Nielsen J.N.
        • Gittelsohn J.
        • Anliker J.
        • O’Brien K.
        Interventions to improve diet and weight gain among pregnant adolescents and recommendations for future research.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106: 1825-1840
        • Norris S.L.
        • Lau J.
        • Smith S.J.
        • Schmid C.H.
        • Engelgau M.M.
        Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control.
        Diabetes Care. 2002; 25: 1159-1171
        • Dusseldorp E.
        • van Elderen T.
        • Maes S.
        • Meulman J.
        • Kraaij V.
        A meta-analysis of psychoeduational programs for coronary heart disease patients.
        Health Psychol. 1999; 18: 506-519
        • Glanz K.
        • Sorensen G.
        • Farmer A.
        The health impact of worksite nutrition and cholesterol intervention programs.
        Am J Heal Promot. 1996; 10: 453-470
        • Desroches S.
        • Lapointe A.
        • Ratté S.
        • Gravel K.
        • Légaré F.
        • Turcotte S.
        Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 2: CD008722
        • Contento I.R.
        Nutrition education: linking research, theory, and practice.
        Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008; 17: 176-179
        • Contento I.R.
        Nutrition Education.
        2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC, Sudbury, MA2011
        • Gillespie A.H.
        • Brun J.K.
        Trends and challenges for nutrition education research.
        J Nutr Educ. 1992; 24: 222-226
        • Contento I.
        Review of nutrition education research in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 1998 to 2007.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2008; 40: 331-340
        • Lytle L.
        • Achterberg C.
        Changing the diet of America’s children: what works and why?.
        J Nutr Educ. 1995; 27: 250-260
        • Spahn J.M.
        • Reeves R.S.
        • Keim K.S.
        • et al.
        State of the evidence regarding behavior change theories and strategies in nutrition counseling to facilitate health and food behavior change.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 879-891
        • Nation M.
        • Crusto C.
        • Wandersman A.
        • et al.
        What works in prevention: principles of effective prevention programs.
        Am Psychol. 2003; 58: 449-456
        • Greidanus I.
        • Contento I.
        The relationship between the ability to solve practical nutrition problems in an adult population and piagetian cognitive levels.
        J Nutr Educ. 1989; 21: 73-81
        • Contento I.
        • Balch G.
        • Bronner Y.
        • Paige D.
        • Gross S.
        • Bisignani L.
        The effectiveness of nutrition education and implications for nutrition education policy, programs, and research: a review of research.
        J Nutr Educ. 1995; 7: 277-418
        • Society for Nutrition Education
        State of Nutrition Education & Promotion for Report.
        (Indianapolis, IN)2009
        • US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
        WIC Nutrition Services Standards.
        (Alexandria, VA)2013
        • Abusabha R.
        • Peacock J.
        • Achterberg C.
        How to make nutrition education more meaningful through facilitated group discussions.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1999; 99: 72-76
        • McClelland J.W.
        • Keenan D.P.
        • Lewis J.
        • et al.
        Review of evaluation tools used to assess the impact of nutrition education on dietary intake and quality, weight management practices, and physical activity of low-income audiences.
        J Nutr Educ. 2001; 33: S35-S48
        • US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service
        Nutrition Education: Principles of Sound Evaluation Impact.
        (Alexandria, VA)2005
        • Contento I.R.
        • Randell J.S.
        • Basch C.E.
        Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002; 34: 2-25
        • Walter S.D.
        • Eliasziw M.
        • Donner A.
        Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 101-110
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1988: 567
        • Kline P.
        The Handbook of Psychological Testing.
        Psychology Press, New York, NY2000: 744
      1. Gateway to Health Communication & Social Marketing Practice. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/index.html. Accessed February 19, 2015.

      2. The Center for Training and Research Translation Overview. The University of North Carolina Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. http://www.centertrt.org/?p=interventions_overview. Accessed February 19, 2015.

      3. The Community Guide. The Guide to Community Preventative Services. http://www.thecommunityguide.org. Accessed February 19, 2015.

        • Kerr J.
        • Sallis J.F.
        • Bromby E.
        • Glanz K.
        Assessing reliability and validity of the GroPromo audit tool for evaluation of grocery store marketing and promotional environments.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44: 597-603
        • Dehdari T.
        • Rahimi T.
        • Aryaeian N.
        • Gohari M.R.
        • Esfeh J.M.
        Developing and testing a measurement tool for assessing predictors of breakfast consumption based on a health promotion model.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: 250-258
        • Hand R.K.
        • Medrow L.
        • Brown K.
        Developing and Assessing Nutrition Education Handouts (DANEH): testing the validity and reliability of the new tool.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; ([published online ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.01.010
        • Abram J.K.
        • Hand R.K.
        • Parrott J.S.
        • Ziegler P.J.
        • Steiber A.L.
        What is your nutrition program missing? Finding answers with the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE).
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115: 122-130