What Does Evidence-Based Mean for Nutrition Educators? Best Practices for Choosing Nutrition Education Interventions Based on the Strength of the Evidence


      Funding agencies and professional organizations are increasingly requiring community-based nutrition education programs to be evidence-based. However, few nutrition education interventions have demonstrated efficacy, particularly for interventions that address the outer layers of the socioecological model (ie, organizational, community, and public policy). This article reviews the types of evidence available to assess the likelihood that a given intervention will deliver the desired outcomes and how these types of evidence might be applied to nutrition education, and then suggests an approach for nutrition educators to evaluate the evidence and adapt interventions if necessary.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.


      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • McLeroy K.R.
        • Bibeau D.
        • Steckler A.
        • Glanz K.
        An ecological perspective on health promotion programs.
        Health Educ Behav. 1988; 15: 351-377
        • Egger G.
        • Swinburn B.
        • Rossner S.
        Dusting off the epidemiological triad: could it work with obesity?.
        Obes Rev. 2003; 4: 115-119
        • Holben D.
        Position of the American Dietetic Association: food insecurity in the United States.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2010; 110: 1368-1377
      1. Contento IR. Nutrition Education: Linking Research, Theory, and Practice. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2011:14.

      2. US Department of Agricuture (USDA). Nutrition Evidence Library. Accessed July 12, 2016.

      3. Kumanyika S.K. Parker L. Sim L.J. Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making. National Academies Press, Washington, DC2010
      4. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Grant Program. Interim Rule. 7 cfr part 272 rin 0584-ae07.
        Fed Regis. 2013; : 78
      5. USDA. FY2016 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program–Education Guidance. Accessed February 23, 2016.

      6. USDA. Best practices in nutrition education for low-income audiences. Accessed February 23, 2016.

      7. USDA. Supplemental nutrition assistance program education. Accessed February 23, 2016.

      8. USDA. Expanded food and nutrition education program. Accessed February 23, 2016.

        • Jadad A.R.
        • Haynes R.B.
        The Cochrane Collaboration: advances and challenges in improving evidence-based decision making.
        Med Decision Making. 1998; 18: 2-9
        • Dumitrescu A.
        • Granados A.
        • Wallace J.
        • Watson S.
        Demand-driven evidence network in Europe.
        Bul World Health Org. 2006; 84: 2
      9. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Evidence Analysis Library. Accessed February 23, 2016.

      10. Grade Working Group. GRADE. Accessed February 23, 2016.

        • USDA
        A series of systematic reviews on the effects of nutrition education on children's and adolescents' dietary intake.
        2012 (Accessed February 23, 2016)
      11. Trochim WM. Research Methods Knowledge Base. Web Center for Social Research Methods, 2006. Accessed February 23, 2016.

        • Katz D.L.
        From controlled trial to community adoption: The Multisite Translational Community Trial.
        Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: e17-e27
        • Spencer L.M.
        • Schooley M.W.
        • Anderson L.A.
        • et al.
        Seeking best practices: a conceptual framework for planning and improving evidence-based practices.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: 130186
      12. National Cancer Institute. Research-tested Intervention Programs (RTIPS) Submission and review process: a guide for program developers. Accessed February 23, 2016.

      13. Cochrane Collaboration. GRADE Handbook. Accessed February 23, 2016.

        • Urban J.B.
        • Hargraves M.
        • Trochim W.M.
        Evolutionary evaluation: implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate.
        Eval Prog Planning. 2014; 45: 127-139
        • Albert D.
        • Fortin R.
        • Herrera C.
        • et al.
        Strengthening chronic diseases prevention programming: the toward evidence-informed practice (TEIP) program evidence tool.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: 12107
        • Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group
        Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 393-403
        • Leeman J.
        • Sommers J.
        • Leung M.M.
        • Ammerman A.
        Disseminating evidence from research and practice: a model for selecting evidence to guide obesity prevention.
        J Pub Health Manag Pract. 2011; 17: 133-140
      14. Center for Training and Research Translation. Center TRT Glossary. Accessed February 23, 2016.

        • Westfall J.M.
        • Mold J.
        • Fagnan L.
        Practice-based research—“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap.
        J Am Med Assoc. 2007; 297: 403-406
        • Ludwig D.S.
        • Peterson K.E.
        • Gortmaker S.L.
        Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 505-508
        • Glasgow R.E.
        • Emmons K.M.
        How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.
        Ann Rev Public Health. 2007; 28: 413-433
        • Linnan L.
        • Steckler A.
        An overview.
        in: Linnan L. Steckler A. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. 1–3. Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA2002: 11-15
        • Patton M.Q.
        Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use.
        Guilford Press, New York, NY2011
        • Albert D.
        • Fortin R.
        • Lessio A.
        • et al.
        Strengthening chronic diseases prevention programming: the toward evidence-informed practice (TEIP) program assessment tool.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: 12106
      15. Small SA, Cooney SM, Eastman G, O'Connor C. Guidelines for selecting an evidence-based program: balancing community needs, program quality, and organizational resources. Accessed February 23, 2016.

      16. O'Connor C, Small SA, Cooney SM. Program fidelity and adaptation: meeting local needs without compromising program effectiveness. Accessed February 23, 2016.

        • Fetsch R.J.
        • Macphee D.
        • Boyer L.K.
        Evidence-based programming: What is a process an extension agent can use to evaluate a program's effectiveness.
        J Ext. 2012; 50: 5