Advertisement

Breastfeeding Is Associated With Higher Retention in WIC After Age 1

Published:September 08, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.07.003

      Abstract

      Objective

      Examine factors associated with retention on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) after 1 year of age.

      Setting

      A large California WIC program.

      Participants

      WIC participants 14 months old (9,632) between July and September, 2016.

      Main Outcome Measure

      Recertification in WIC by 14 months of age.

      Analysis

      Multivariate logistic regression was performed and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to examine factors associated with child retention in WIC at age 14 months.

      Results

      Mothers performing any amount of breastfeeding from 6 to 12 months were more likely than mothers not breastfeeding to recertify their children in WIC at age 14 months. The odds of retention for children fully breastfed from 6 to 12 months was about 3 times higher than for fully formula-fed children (95% CI, 2.46–3.59). The odds of retention for mostly breastfed children and children fed some breast milk but mostly formula were 1.95 (95% CI, 1.57–2.43) and 1.72 (95% CI, 1.41–2.10) times higher than fully formula-fed children. Prenatal intention to breastfeed (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16–1.55), online education (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03–1.13), missing benefits (OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.17–0.21), underredemption of WIC benefits (OR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.45–0.58), early enrollment in WIC (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.09–1.14), number of family members receiving WIC (OR = 1.29, 95% CI, 1.14–1.46), English language preference (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.64), and participation in Medicaid (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14–1.47) were also associated with retention.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Results from this study suggested there are a number of areas WIC programs may target to promote ongoing participation in the program. These include support for both breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women, technology-based strategies, and targeted outreach to pregnant women, participants who have missed benefits, and participants who have not redeemed their benefits. Research that examines the impact of targeted interventions directed at ≥1 of these areas is essential to help WIC programs maintain contact with children into early childhood.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. US Department of Agriculture. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) frequently asked questions. http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/frequently-asked-questions-about-wic. Accessed August 4, 2017.

      2. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. WIC program. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/wic-program.aspx. Accessed August 4, 2017.

        • Tester J.M.
        • Leung C.W.
        • Crawford P.B.
        Revised WIC food package and children’s diet quality.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 137https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3557
        • Gu X.
        • Tucker K.L.
        Dietary quality of the US child and adolescent population: trends from 1999 to 2012 and associations with the use of federal nutrition assistance programs.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 105: 194-202
        • Au L.E.
        • Whaley S.
        • Gurzo K.
        • Meza M.
        • Ritchie L.D.
        If you build it they will come: satisfaction of WIC participants with online and traditional in-person nutrition education.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016; 48: 336-342
      3. Au LE, Whaley S, Gurzo K, Rosen NJ, Meza M, Ritchie LD. Evaluation of online and in-person nutrition education related to salt knowledge and behaviors among WIC participants. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117:1384-1395.

        • Au L.E.
        • Whaley S.
        • Rosen N.J.
        • Meza M.
        • Ritchie L.D.
        Online and in-person nutrition education improves breakfast knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: a randomized trial of participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 490-500
        • Fingar K.R.
        • Lob S.H.
        • Dove M.S.
        • Gradziel P.
        • Curtis M.P.
        Reassessing the association between WIC and birth outcomes using a fetuses-at-risk approach.
        Matern Child Health J. 2017; 21: 825-835
      4. Jacknowitz A, Tiehen L. WIC participation patterns: an investigation of delayed entry and early exit. ERR-109. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=44783. August 4, 2017.

        • Jacknowitz A.
        • Tiehen L.
        Transitions into and out of the WIC Program: A Cause for Concern?.
        Soc Serv Rev. 2009; 83: 151-183
        • Rosenberg T.J.
        • Alperen J.K.
        • Chiasson M.A.
        Why do WIC participants fail to pick up their checks? An urban study in the wake of welfare reform.
        Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 477-481
        • Woelfel M.L.
        • Abusabha R.
        • Pruzek R.
        • Stratton H.
        • Chen S.G.
        • Edmunds L.S.
        Barriers to the use of WIC services.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 105: 736-743
        • Whaley S.E.
        • Koleilat M.
        • Jiang L.
        WIC infant food package issuance data are a valid measure of infant feeding practices.
        J Hum Lact. 2012; 28: 134-138
      5. US Department of Agriculture. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Final rule: revisions in the WIC food packages. https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/fr-030414. Accessed on August, 4, 2017.

      6. California - PHFE WIC Program. WIC Online Nutrition Education. http://www.wiconlineeducation.org/. Accessed August 4, 2017.

      7. WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study–2: Infant Year Report. US Dept of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Alexandria, VA: USDA/FNS. https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/WIC-ITFPS2-Infant.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2017.

        • Bensley R.J.
        • Hovis A.
        • Horton K.D.
        • et al.
        Accessibility and preferred use of online Web applications among WIC participants with Internet access.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: S87-S92
        • Sekhobo J.P.
        • Peck S.R.
        • Byun Y.
        • et al.
        Use of a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the implementation of retention promotion strategies in the New York State WIC program.
        Eval Prog Plng. 2017; 63: 7-17