Advertisement
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior
Advanced searchSave search
Research Article| Volume 49, ISSUE 10, P810-816.e1, November 2017

Breastfeeding Is Associated With Higher Retention in WIC After Age 1

Published:September 08, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.07.003
Breastfeeding Is Associated With Higher Retention in WIC After Age 1
Previous ArticleTu Salud ¡Sí Cuenta! Your Health Matters! A Community-wide Campaign in a Hispanic Border Community in Texas
Next ArticleFaster, Stronger, Healthier: Adolescent-Stated Reasons for Dietary Supplementation

      Abstract

      Objective

      Examine factors associated with retention on the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) after 1 year of age.

      Setting

      A large California WIC program.

      Participants

      WIC participants 14 months old (9,632) between July and September, 2016.

      Main Outcome Measure

      Recertification in WIC by 14 months of age.

      Analysis

      Multivariate logistic regression was performed and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to examine factors associated with child retention in WIC at age 14 months.

      Results

      Mothers performing any amount of breastfeeding from 6 to 12 months were more likely than mothers not breastfeeding to recertify their children in WIC at age 14 months. The odds of retention for children fully breastfed from 6 to 12 months was about 3 times higher than for fully formula-fed children (95% CI, 2.46–3.59). The odds of retention for mostly breastfed children and children fed some breast milk but mostly formula were 1.95 (95% CI, 1.57–2.43) and 1.72 (95% CI, 1.41–2.10) times higher than fully formula-fed children. Prenatal intention to breastfeed (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.16–1.55), online education (OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03–1.13), missing benefits (OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.17–0.21), underredemption of WIC benefits (OR = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.45–0.58), early enrollment in WIC (OR = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.09–1.14), number of family members receiving WIC (OR = 1.29, 95% CI, 1.14–1.46), English language preference (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.64), and participation in Medicaid (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14–1.47) were also associated with retention.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Results from this study suggested there are a number of areas WIC programs may target to promote ongoing participation in the program. These include support for both breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding women, technology-based strategies, and targeted outreach to pregnant women, participants who have missed benefits, and participants who have not redeemed their benefits. Research that examines the impact of targeted interventions directed at ≥1 of these areas is essential to help WIC programs maintain contact with children into early childhood.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Register: Create an account
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. US Department of Agriculture. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) frequently asked questions. http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/frequently-asked-questions-about-wic. Accessed August 4, 2017.

        View in Article

      2. US Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. WIC program. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/wic-program.aspx. Accessed August 4, 2017.

        View in Article
        • Tester J.M.
        • Leung C.W.
        • Crawford P.B.
        Revised WIC food package and children’s diet quality.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 137https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3557
        View in Article
        • Gu X.
        • Tucker K.L.
        Dietary quality of the US child and adolescent population: trends from 1999 to 2012 and associations with the use of federal nutrition assistance programs.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 105: 194-202
        View in Article
        • Au L.E.
        • Whaley S.
        • Gurzo K.
        • Meza M.
        • Ritchie L.D.
        If you build it they will come: satisfaction of WIC participants with online and traditional in-person nutrition education.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016; 48: 336-342
        View in Article

      6. Au LE, Whaley S, Gurzo K, Rosen NJ, Meza M, Ritchie LD. Evaluation of online and in-person nutrition education related to salt knowledge and behaviors among WIC participants. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117:1384-1395.

        View in Article
        • Au L.E.
        • Whaley S.
        • Rosen N.J.
        • Meza M.
        • Ritchie L.D.
        Online and in-person nutrition education improves breakfast knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors: a randomized trial of participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 490-500
        View in Article
        • Fingar K.R.
        • Lob S.H.
        • Dove M.S.
        • Gradziel P.
        • Curtis M.P.
        Reassessing the association between WIC and birth outcomes using a fetuses-at-risk approach.
        Matern Child Health J. 2017; 21: 825-835
        View in Article

      9. Jacknowitz A, Tiehen L. WIC participation patterns: an investigation of delayed entry and early exit. ERR-109. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=44783. August 4, 2017.

        View in Article
        • Jacknowitz A.
        • Tiehen L.
        Transitions into and out of the WIC Program: A Cause for Concern?.
        Soc Serv Rev. 2009; 83: 151-183
        View in Article
        • Rosenberg T.J.
        • Alperen J.K.
        • Chiasson M.A.
        Why do WIC participants fail to pick up their checks? An urban study in the wake of welfare reform.
        Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 477-481
        View in Article
        • Woelfel M.L.
        • Abusabha R.
        • Pruzek R.
        • Stratton H.
        • Chen S.G.
        • Edmunds L.S.
        Barriers to the use of WIC services.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 105: 736-743
        View in Article
        • Whaley S.E.
        • Koleilat M.
        • Jiang L.
        WIC infant food package issuance data are a valid measure of infant feeding practices.
        J Hum Lact. 2012; 28: 134-138
        View in Article

      14. US Department of Agriculture. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Final rule: revisions in the WIC food packages. https://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/fr-030414. Accessed on August, 4, 2017.

        View in Article

      15. California - PHFE WIC Program. WIC Online Nutrition Education. http://www.wiconlineeducation.org/. Accessed August 4, 2017.

        View in Article

      16. WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study–2: Infant Year Report. US Dept of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Alexandria, VA: USDA/FNS. https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ops/WIC-ITFPS2-Infant.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2017.

        View in Article
        • Bensley R.J.
        • Hovis A.
        • Horton K.D.
        • et al.
        Accessibility and preferred use of online Web applications among WIC participants with Internet access.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: S87-S92
        View in Article
        • Sekhobo J.P.
        • Peck S.R.
        • Byun Y.
        • et al.
        Use of a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the implementation of retention promotion strategies in the New York State WIC program.
        Eval Prog Plng. 2017; 63: 7-17
        View in Article

      Article info

      Publication history

      Published online: September 08, 2017
      Accepted: July 6, 2017

      Footnotes

      Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors' conflict of interest disclosures can be found online with this article on www.jneb.org.

      Identification

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2017.07.003

      Copyright

      ©2017 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Published by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.

      ScienceDirect

      Access this article on ScienceDirect

      The content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals.


      We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. To update your cookie settings, please visit the Cookie Preference Center for this site.
      Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. except certain content provided by third parties.


      RELX