Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 10, P993-1004, November 2018

Download started.

Ok

Performance Nutrition Dining Facility Intervention Improves Special Operations Soldiers’ Diet Quality and Meal Satisfaction

Published:August 29, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2018.06.011

      Abstract

      Objective

      To assess the impact of the Special Operations Forces Human Performance Program dining facility (DFAC) intervention on patron diet quality and meal satisfaction.

      Design

      Nonrandomized, controlled time series study using digital food photography and surveys pre-post intervention (0, 4, 8, and 12 months).

      Setting

      Two Fort Bragg, NC military installation DFACs.

      Participants

      Volunteers (n = 688 total; n = 573 complete dataset) were US Army active duty soldiers.

      Intervention

      The DFAC intervention included food choice architecture, new performance-optimizing food recipes to increase nutrient density, revised menus to offer more performance foods daily, and nutrition labeling to influence food choice.

      Main Outcome Measures

      Daily DFAC nutrient intake and Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2010 scores.

      Analysis

      Descriptive and ANOVA statistical analyses were performed between control and intervention groups and from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 months postintervention (α = .05; 80% power).

      Results

      The intervention resulted in a higher posttest HEI score (60.1 ± 8.8 points; +3.4%; P = .005) and DFAC satisfaction compared with control (49.0 ± 10.4 points; P > .05). Improved intervention HEI scores were attributed to changes in citrus and melon fruit (+46%), red and orange vegetables (+35%), whole grains (+181%), legumes (65%), yogurt (+45%), oils (–26%), and solid fat (–18%) consumption (all P < .05).

      Conclusions and Implications

      These data illustrate that the Special Operations Forces Human Performance Program military DFAC nutrition intervention was feasible to implement and was associated with diet quality improvements. Access to high-quality ingredients and recipes may improve soldier meal quality and acceptance in other settings and warrants further investigation.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lowe MR
        • Tappe KA
        • Butryn ML
        • et al.
        An intervention study targeting energy and nutrient intake in worksite cafeterias.
        Eat Behav. 2010; 11: 144-151
        • Mayer JA
        • Brown TP
        • Heins JM
        • Bishop DB
        A multi-component intervention for modifying food selections in a worksite cafeteria.
        J Nutr Educ. 1987; 19: 277-280
        • Jeffery RW
        • French SA
        • Raether C
        • Baxter JE
        An environmental intervention to increase fruit and salad purchases in a cafeteria.
        Prev Med. 1994; 23: 788-792
        • Levy DE
        • Riis J
        • Sonnenberg LM
        • Barraclough SJ
        • Thorndike AN
        Food choices of minority and low-income employees: a cafeteria intervention.
        Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: 240-248
        • Michels KB
        • Bloom BR
        • Riccardi P
        • Rosner BA
        • Willett WC
        A study of the importance of education and cost incentives on individual food choices at the Harvard School of Public Health cafeteria.
        J Am Coll Nutr. 2008; 27: 6-11
        • Zifferblatt SM
        • Wilbur CS
        • Pinsky JL
        Changing cafeteria eating habits—new direction for public-health care.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1980; 76: 15-20
        • Buscher LA
        • Martin KA
        • Crocker S
        Point-of-purchase messages framed in terms of cost, convenience, taste, and energy improve healthful snack selection in a college foodservice setting.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101: 909-913
        • Levin S
        Pilot study of a cafeteria program relying primarily on symbols to promote healthy choices.
        J Nutr Educ. 1996; 28: 282-285
        • Arsenault JE
        • Singleton MC
        • Funderburk LK
        Use of the Go-for-Green nutrition labeling system in military dining facilities is associated with lowerfat intake.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114: 1067-1071
        • Milich R
        • Anderson J
        • Mills M
        Effects of visual presentation of caloric values on food buying by normal and obese persons.
        Percept Mot Skills. 1976; 42: 155-162
        • Purvis DL
        • Lentino CV
        • Jackson TK
        • Murphy KJ
        • Deuster PA
        Nutrition as a component of the performance triad: how healthy eating behaviors contribute to soldier performance and military readiness.
        US Army Med Dep J. 2013 Oct-Dec; : 66-78
        • Smith TJ
        • Dotson LE
        • Young AJ
        • et al.
        Eating patterns and leisure-time exercise among active duty military personnel: comparison to the Healthy People objectives.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 907-919
        • Lutz LJ
        • Gaffney-Stomberg E
        • Williams KW
        • et al.
        Adherence to the dietary guidelines for Americans is associated with psychological resilience in young adults: a cross-sectional study.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 117: 396-403
      1. Bray RM, Pemberton MR, Hourani LL, et al. 2008 Department of Defense Survey of Health Related Behaviors Among Active Duty Military Personnel: A Component of the Defense Lifestyle Assessment Program (DLAP). Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International; 2009. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a527178.pdf. Accessed October 13, 2018.

        • Bingham CM
        • Lahti-Koski M
        • Puukka P
        • Kinnunen M
        • Jallinoja P
        • Absetz P.
        Effects of a healthy food supply intervention in a military setting: positive changes in cereal, fat and sugar containing foods.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 91-101
        • Crombie AP
        • Funderburk LK
        • Smith TJ
        • et al.
        Effects of modified foodservice practices in military dining facilities on ad libitum nutritional intake of US army soldiers.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 920-927
        • Montain SJ
        • Carvey CE
        • Stephens MB
        Nutritional fitness.
        Mil Med. 2010; 175: 65-72
        • Thomas DT
        • Erdman KA
        • Burke LM
        Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: nutrition and athletic performance.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 501-528
      2. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction. Chairman's Total Force Fitness Framework. CJCSI 3405.01. Chairman's Total Force Fitness Framework 2011. http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Library/Instructions/3405_01.pdf?ver=2016-02-05-175032-517. Accessed October 13, 2018.

      3. US Army Public Health Command. Performance triad. https://phc.amedd.army.mil/topics/campaigns/perftriad/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed October 13, 2018.

      4. US Army Special Operations Command. Memorandum for Record: Secial Operations Forces (SOF) Performance-Based Menu Standards and Guidelines. In: US Army Special Operations Command; 2012.

      5. US Olympic Committee. US Olympic Center Athlete Training Table Performance-Based Menu Recommended Planning Guidelines. Colorado Springs, CO: Olympic Training Center; 2011.

        • US Department of Agriculture
        Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010.
        US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2010
      6. Department of Defense. Joint Subsistence Policy Board Department of Defense Menu Standards 2010. http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/support/21st_Century_Sailor/physical/Documents/DOD%20Nutrition%20Standards-FINAL%20.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2017.

      7. Department of the Army Pamphlet 30-22. Operating Procedures for the Army Food Program. Washington, DC: Army DOT; 2017. https://dmna.ny.gov/foodservice/docs/references/DA_PAM_30-22.pdf. Accessed December 14, 2017.

        • McClung HL
        • Champagne CM
        • Allen HR
        • et al.
        Digital food photography technology improves efficiency and feasibility of dietary intake assessments in large populations eating ad libitum in collective dining facilities.
        Appetite. 2017; 116: 389-394
        • Williamson D
        • Allen H
        • Martin P
        • Alfonso A
        • Gerald B
        • Hunt A
        Comparison of digital photography to weighed and visual estimation of portion sizes.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2003; 103: 1139-1145
        • Williamson D
        • Allen H
        • Martin P
        • Alfonso A
        • Gerald B
        • Hunt A
        Digital photography: a new method for estimating food intake in cafeteria settings.
        J Eat Weight Disord. 2004; 9: 24-28
      8. Agricultural Research Service. Food Surveys Research Group. Beltsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture; 2016. http://www.ars.usda.gov/nea/bhnrc/fsrg. Accessed July 25, 2018.

      9. US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans: 2015-2020. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/appendix-3/.Accessed December 14, 2017.

        • Guenther PM
        • Casavale KO
        • Reedy J
        • et al.
        Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 569-580
        • Wang DD
        • Leung CW
        • Li Y
        • et al.
        Trends in dietary quality among adults in the United States, 1999 through 2010.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1587-1595
        • McGill CR
        • Birkett A
        • Fulgonii Iii VL
        Healthy Eating Index-2010 and food groups consumed by US adults who meet or exceed fiber intake recommendations NHANES 2001-2010.
        Food Nutr Res. 2016; 60: 29977
        • Belanger BA
        • Kwon J
        Effectiveness of healthy menu changes in a nontrainee military dining facility.
        Mil Med. 2016; 181: 82-89
        • Sproul AD
        • Canter DD
        • Schmidt JB
        Does point-of-purchase nutrition labeling influence meal selections? A test inan Army cafeteria.
        Mil Med. 2003; 168: 556-560
        • Thorndike AN
        • Sonnenberg L
        • Riis J
        • Barraclough S
        • Levy DE
        A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 527-533
        • Thorndike AN
        • Riis J
        • Sonnenberg LM
        • Levy DE
        Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: promoting healthy food choices.
        Am J Prev Med. 2014; 46: 143-149
        • Christoph MJ
        • Ellison BD
        • Meador EN
        The influence of nutrition label placement on awareness and use among college students in a dining hall setting.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 1395-1405
        • Vyth EL
        • Steenhuis IHM
        • Heymans MW
        • Roodenburg AJC
        • Brug J
        • Seidell JC
        Influence of placement of a nutrition logo on cafeteria menu items on lunchtime food choices at Dutch work sites.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111: 131-136
        • Beydoun MA
        • Fanelli-Kuczmarski MT
        • Allen A
        • et al.
        Monetary value of diet is associated with dietary quality and nutrient adequacy among urban adults, differentially by sex, race and poverty status.
        PLoS One. 2015; 10e0140905
        • Zoellner J
        • You W
        • Connell C
        • et al.
        Health literacy is associated with healthy eating index scores and sugar-sweetened beverage intake: findings from the rural Lower Mississippi Delta.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111: 1012-1020
        • Bernstein AM
        • Bloom DE
        • Rosner BA
        • Franz M
        • Willett WC
        Relation of food cost to healthfulness of diet among US women.
        Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 92: 1197-1203
        • Drewnowski A
        Nutrition economics: How to eat better for less.
        J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2015; 61: S69-S71
        • Rehm CD
        • Monsivais P
        • Drewnowski A
        Relation between diet cost and Healthy Eating Index 2010 scores among adults in the United States 2007-2010.
        Prev Med. 2015; 73: 70-75
        • Beals K
        • Darnell ME
        • Lovalekar M
        • et al.
        Suboptimal nutritional characteristics in male and female soldiers compared to sports nutrition guidelines.
        Mil Med. 2015; 180: 1239-1246
        • Lutz LJ
        • Gaffney-Stomberg E
        • Scisco JL
        • et al.
        Assessment of dietary intake using the healthy eating index during military training.
        US Army Med Dep J. 2013; Oct-Dec: 91-97
        • Mullie P
        • Clarys P
        Relation between dietary pattern analysis (principal component analysis) and body mass index: a 5-year follow-up study in a Belgian military population.
        J R Army Med Corps. 2016; 162: 23-29
        • Mullie P
        • Deliens T
        • Clarys P
        Relation between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, nutrition, and lifestyle ina military population.
        Mil Med. 2016; 181: 1335-1339