Perspective| Volume 51, ISSUE 5, P636-643, May 2019

Download started.


Walk This Way: Our Perspective on Challenges and Opportunities for Extension Statewide Walking Promotion Programs

Published:February 02, 2019DOI:


      Evidence-based walking programs exist and some have been tailored specifically for the national Cooperative Extension System; however, program outcomes and translational challenges and successes are underreported. This has presented a challenge to scaling the best-fit intervention for walking promotion within this national system. Here, we describe existing open-access walking programs as well as implications for improving the fit and sustainability of this intervention type within the system. Our experience provides suggestions for pragmatic data collection, infrastructure to support pragmatic data collection, and novel ways to disseminate best practices, as well as considerations for de-implementing what is not working.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.


      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Franz NK Townson L
        The nature of complex organizations: the case of Cooperative Extension.
        New Dir Eval. 2008; 120: 5-14
        • Franz N
        • Arnold M
        • Baughman S
        The role of evaluation in determining the public value of Extension.
        J Ext. 2014; 52: 4COM3
        • Dwyer JW
        • Contreras D
        • Eschbach CL
        • et al.
        Cooperative Extension as a framework for Health Extension: the Michigan State University model.
        Acad Med. 2017; 92: 1416-1420
        • Hill LG
        • Parker LA
        Extension as a delivery system for prevention programming: capacity, barriers, and opportunities.
        J Ext. 2005; 43: 1FEA1
        • MacKenzie Whetstone L
        • Kolasa KM
        • Dunn C
        • et al.
        Effects of a behavior-based weight management program delivered through a state cooperative extension and local public health department network, North Carolina, 2008-2009.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8: A81
        • Natker E
        • Baker SS
        • Auld G
        • McGirr K
        • Sutherland B
        • Cason KL
        Formative evaluation of EFNEP curriculum: ensuring the Eating Smart • Being Active curriculum is theory based.
        J Ext. 2015; 53: 1RIB1
        • Reed D
        • Lester D
        • Danberry K
        • Fink PL
        • Owens S
        Perceptions of the role of West Virginia's Cooperative Extension Service in tobacco control coalitions.
        Front Public Health. 2016; 4: 83
        • Peña-Purcell N
        • Bowen E
        • Zoumenou V
        • et al.
        Extension professionals’ strengths and needs related to nutrition and health programs.
        J Ext. 2012; 50: 3RIB2
      1. US Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Act of 2014: The Farm Bill. Accessed March 2, 2018.

        • Harden SM
        • Lindsay A
        • Gunter KB
        How to leverage your state's land grant extension system: partnering to promote physical activity.
        Transl J Am College Sports Med. 2018; 3: 113-118
      2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture. National Framework for Health and Wellness. Accessed March 2, 2018.

        • Brown DR
        • Carlson SA
        • Kumar GS
        • Fulton J
        Research highlights from the status report for Step It Up! The Surgeon General's call to action to promote walking and walkable communities.
        J Sport Health Sci. 2018; 7: 5-6
        • Kumar GS
        Proportion of adults who identified walking as a US Surgeon general priority.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15: E62
        • Reis JP
        • Macera CA
        • Ainsworth BE
        • Hipp DA
        Prevalence of total daily walking among US adults, 2002-2003.
        J Phys Act Health. 2008; 5: 337-346
        • Murphy MH
        • Nevill AM
        • Murtagh EM
        • Holder RL
        The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials.
        Prev Med. 2007; 44: 377-385
        • Tucker JM
        • Welk GJ
        • Beyler NK
        Physical activity in U.S.: adults’ compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.
        Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40: 454-461
        • Downey SM
        • Wages J
        • Jackson SF
        • Estabrooks PA
        Adoption decisions and implementation of a community-based physical activity program: a mixed methods study.
        Health Promot Pract. 2012; 13: 175-182
        • Rogers EM.
        Diffusion of Innovations.
        Free Press of Glencoe, New York, NY1962
        • Bull NH
        • Cote LS
        • Warner PD
        • McKinnie MR
        Is Extension relevant for the 21st century?.
        J Ext. 2004; 42: 6COM2
        • Dunifon R
        • Duttweiler M
        • Pillemer K
        • Tobias D
        • Trochim WMK
        Evidence-based Extension.
        J Ext. 2004; 42: 2FEA2
        • Fetsch RJ
        • MacPhee D
        • Boyer LK
        Evidence-based programming: what is a process an Extension agent can use to evaluate a program's effectiveness?.
        J Ext. 2012; 50: 5FEA2
        • Harden SM
        • Smith ML
        • Ory MG
        • Smith-Ray RL
        • Estabrooks P
        • Glasgow R
        RE-AIM in clinical, community, and corporate settings: perspectives, strategies, and recommendations to enhance public health impact.
        Front Public Health. 2018; 6: 71
        • Peek CJ
        • Glasgow RE
        • Stange KC
        • Klesges LM
        • Purcell EP
        • Kessler RS
        The 5 R's: an emerging bold standard for conducting relevant research in a changing world.
        Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12: 447-455
        • Estabrooks PA
        • Allen KC.
        Updating, employing, and adapting: a commentary on What does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model.
        Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36: 67-72
        • Glasgow RE
        What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation.
        Health Educ Behav. 2013; 40: 257-265
        • Battaglia C
        • Glasgow RE
        Pragmatic dissemination and implementation research models, methods and measures and their relevance for nursing research.
        Nurs Outlook. 2018; 66: 430-455
        • Gaglio B
        • Phillips SM
        • Heurtin-Roberts S
        • Sanchez MA
        • Glasgow RE
        How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of research.
        Implement Sci. 2014; 9: 96
        • Chambers DA
        • Norton WE
        The adaptome: advancing the science of intervention adaptation.
        Am J Prev Med. 2016; 51: S124-S131
        • Harden SM
        • Johnson SB
        • Almeida FA
        • Estabrooks PA
        Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial.
        Transl Behav Med. 2017; 7: 28-38
        • Arvey SR
        • Fernandez ME
        Identifying the core elements of effective community health worker programs: a research agenda.
        Am J Public Health. 2012; 102: 1633-1637
        • Aarons GA
        • Sklar M
        • Mustanski B
        • Benbow N
        • Brown CH
        “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 111
        • Glasgow RE
        • Vogt TM
        • Boles SM
        Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.
        Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 1322-1327
      3. Teran B, Hongu N. Successful statewide walking program websites. J Ext. 50:1TOT9.

        • Brownson RC
        • Eyler AA
        • Harris JK
        • Moore JB
        • Tabak RG
        Getting the word out: new approaches for disseminating public health science.
        J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018; 24: 102-111
      4. Balis LE, Strayer T, Ramalingam N, Wilson M, Harden SM. Open-access physical activity programs for older adults: a pragmatic and systematic review [published online ahead of print January 10, 2018]. Gerontologist.

      5. About the Walk With Ease program. Accessed March 31, 2018.

        • Downey LH
        • Peterson DJ
        • Donaldson JL
        • Hardman A
        An Extension application of the RE-AIM evaluation framework.
        J Ext. 2017; 55: 3IAW1
        • Balis LE
        • John DH
        • Harden SM
        Beyond evaluation: using the RE-AIM framework for program planning in extension.
        J Ext. 2019; 57: 2TOT1
        • Michie S
        • van Stralen MM
        • West R
        The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.
        Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 42
        • Harden SM
        • McEwan D
        • Sylvester BD
        • et al.
        Understanding for whom, under what conditions, and how group-based physical activity interventions are successful: a realist review.
        BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 958
        • Harden SM
        • Burke SM
        • Haile AM
        • Estabrooks PA
        Generalizing the findings from group dynamics-based physical activity research to practice settings: what do we know?.
        Eval Health Prof. 2015; 38: 3-14
        • Carron AV
        • Spink KS
        Team building in an exercise setting.
        Sport Psychol. 1993; 7: 8-18
        • Burke SM
        • Carron AV
        • Eys MA
        • Ntoumanis N
        • Estabrooks PA
        Group versus individual approach? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity.
        Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2006; 2: 19-35
        • Estabrooks PA
        • Bradshaw M
        • Dzewaltowski DA
        • Smith-Ray RL
        Determining the impact of Walk Kansas: applying a team-building approach to community physical activity promotion.
        Ann Behav Med. 2008; 36: 1-12
        • Johnson SB
        • Harden SM
        • Estabrooks PA
        Uptake of evidence-based physical activity programs: comparing perceptions of adopters and nonadopters.
        Transl Behav Med. 2016; 6: 629-637
        • Evans A
        • Ranjit N
        • Hoelscher D
        • et al.
        Impact of school-based vegetable garden and physical activity coordinated health interventions on weight status and weight-related behaviors of ethnically diverse, low-income students: study design and baseline data of the Texas, Grow! Eat! Go! (TGEG) cluster-randomized controlled trial.
        BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 973
        • Spears-Lanoix EC
        • McKyer ELJ
        • Evans A
        • et al.
        Using family-focused garden, nutrition, and physical activity programs to reduce childhood obesity: the Texas! Go! Eat! Grow! pilot study.
        Child Obes. 2015; 11: 707-714
      6. Hornbeck MB. A County Employee Wellness Program Encouraged Increased Physical Activity to Lower Health Care Costs for County Employees. Accessed January 15, 2019.

      7. Jarvandi S. Tennessee Choices for Better Health (2015). Accessed January 15, 2019.

        • Gaglio B
        • Shoup JA
        • Glasgow RE
        The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.
        Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: e38-e46
        • Kessler RS
        • Purcell EP
        • Glasgow RE
        • Klesges LM
        • Benkeser RM
        • Peek CJ
        What does it mean to “employ” the RE-AIM model?.
        Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36: 44-66
        • Glasgow RE
        Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15170271
        • Jack L
        Preventing chronic disease: celebrating contributions and defining future directions.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2017; 14: E13
      8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing chronic disease: Implementation Evaluation Checklist. Accessed December 20, 2018.

        • Burkhardt JT
        • Schröter DC
        • Magura S
        • Means SN
        • Coryn CLS
        An overview of evidence-based program registers (EBPRs) for behavioral health.
        Eval Program Plann. 2015; 48: 92-99
      9. Research-Tested Intervention Programs. Accessed March 30, 2018.

        • Fitzsimons CF
        • Baker G
        • Wright A
        • et al.
        The “Walking for Wellbeing in the West” randomised controlled trial of a pedometer-based walking programme in combination with physical activity consultation with 12 month follow-up: rationale and study design.
        BMC Public Health. 2008; 8: 259
        • Brownson RC
        • Ballew P
        • Brown KL
        • et al.
        The effect of disseminating evidence-based interventions that promote physical activity to health departments.
        Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 1900-1907
        • Damschroder LJ
        • Aron DC
        • Keith RE
        • Kirsh SR
        • Alexander JA
        • Lowery JC
        Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50
        • Scott SD
        • Plotnikoff RC
        • Karunamuni N
        • Bize R
        • Rodgers W
        Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian Heart Health Kit (HHK).
        Implement Sci. 2008; 3: 41
        • Klerkx L
        • Schut M
        • Leeuwis C
        • Kilelu C
        Advances in knowledge brokering in the agricultural sector: towards innovation system facilitation.
        IDS Bull. 2012; 43: 53-60
        • Henderson JL
        • Chaim G
        • Luca S
        • et al.
        Program manager perspectives on the service system to meet the needs of youth with concurrent disorders: findings from a Canadian national survey.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2015; 15: 393
        • Betancourt JR
        • Tan-McGrory A
        • Kenst KS
        • Phan TH
        • Lopez L
        Organizational change management for health equity: perspectives from the Disparities Leadership Program.
        Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36: 1095-1101
        • Glasgow RE
        • Estabrooks PE
        Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2018; 15: E02
        • Harrison MB
        • Graham ID
        Roadmap for a participatory research-practice partnership to implement evidence.
        Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2012; 9: 210-220
        • Cohen DJ
        • Crabtree BF
        • Etz RS
        • et al.
        Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice.
        Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: S381-S389
        • Hawe P
        • Shiell A
        • Riley T
        Complex interventions: how “out of control” can a randomised controlled trial be?.
        BMJ. 2004; 328: 1561-1563
        • Esakia A
        • Harden SM
        • McCrickard DS
        • Horning M
        in: Mark G Fussell S Channeling group dynamics strategies with smartwatches in a physical activity intervention. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY2017: 2551-2559
        • Miller-Halegoua SM
        Why null results do not mean no results: negative findings have implications for policy, practice, and research.
        Transl Behav Med. 2017; 7: 137
        • Niven DJ
        • Mrklas KJ
        • Holodinsky JK
        • et al.
        Towards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping review.
        BMC Med. 2015; 13: 255
        • Davidoff F
        On the undiffusion of established practices.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175: 809-811
        • Sweet SN
        • Ginis KAM
        • Estabrooks PA
        • Latimer-Cheung AE
        Operationalizing the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of multi-sector partnerships.
        Implement Sci. 2014; 9: 74