Research Article| Volume 52, ISSUE 3, P270-280, March 2020

Download started.


Contextual Factors Influence Professional Development Attendance Among Child Care Providers in Nebraska

Published:November 08, 2019DOI:



      To examine contextual factors that may influence child care providers’ motivators for attending nutrition-related training and their preferences and barriers to attending professional development training.


      Cross-sectional survey completed between January and April 2017.


      Licensed child care programs (n = 1,490) across urban and rural Nebraska.


      Child care center directors (n = 336) and family child care home providers (n = 1,154).

      Main Outcome Measure(s)

      Motivators, preferences, and barriers of child care providers for attending professional development.


      Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted.


      Top motivators for attending nutrition-related training included meeting licensure requirements and improving job performance. Child care providers most commonly selected preferences for receiving training included in-person and online delivery. Top barriers to obtaining training were schedule conflicts, accessibility, and cost. Child care centers and participants in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment in Child Care (Go NAP SACC) were more likely to be motivated by licensure requirements. Rural providers were also more likely to report barriers such as inability to travel and limited access to training. Results revealed that child care type, geographic location, CACFP and Go NAP SACC participation can influence child care providers’ motivators, preferences, and barriers to attending training.

      Conclusions And Implications

      Results highlight the importance of offering professional development training that best fits child care providers’ needs and preferences.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.


      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Laughlin L. Who's minding the kids? Child Care Arrangements: Spring 2011. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2013.

        • Trust for America's Health and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
        The State of Obesity in Nebraska. Washington, DC: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 2016;
        • Sigman-Grant M
        • Christiansen E
        • Fernandez G
        • et al.
        Child care provider training and a supportive feeding environment in child care settings in 4 States, 2003.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2011; 8: A113
        • Van Stan S
        • Lessard L
        • Dupont Phillips K
        The impact of a statewide training to increase child care providers’ knowledge of nutrition and physical activity rules in Delaware.
        Child Obes. 2013; 9: 43-50
        • Kakietek J
        • Dunn L
        • O'Dell SA
        • Jernigan J
        • Kettel Khan L
        Training and technical assistance for compliance with beverage and physical activity components of New York City's regulations for early child care centers.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2014; 11: E177
        • Roberts AM
        • Iruka IU
        • Sarver SL
        Nebraska early childhood workforce survey: a focus on providers and teachers. Omaha, NE: The Buffet Early Childhood Institute.
      2. Whitebook M, McLean C, Austin L. Early Childhood Workforce Index-2016. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley; 2016.

        • Nanney MS
        • LaRowe TL
        • Davey C
        • Frost N
        • Arcan C
        • O'Meara J
        Obesity prevention in early child care settings: a bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) assessment of best practices, implementation difficulty, and barriers.
        Health Educ Behav. 2017; 44: 31-32
        • Kim J
        • Shim JE
        • Wiley AR
        • Kim K
        • McBride BA
        Is there a difference between center and home care providers’ training, perceptions, and practices related to obesity prevention?.
        Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 1559-1566
        • Battista RA
        • Oakley H
        • Weddell MS
        • Mudd LM
        • Greene JB
        • West ST
        Improving the physical activity and nutrition environment through self-assessment (NAP SACC) in rural area child care centers in North Carolina.
        Prev Med. 2014; 67: S10-S16
        • Liese AD
        • Weis KE
        • Pluto D
        • Smith E
        • Lawson A
        Food store types, availability, and cost of foods in a rural environment.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2007; 107: 1916-1923
        • Johnson JA
        • Johnson AM
        Urban-rural differences in childhood and adolescent obesity in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Child Obes. 2015; 11: 233-241
      3. United States Department of Agriculture. Child and Adult Care Food Program: Meal Pattern Revisions Related to the Healthy, Hungry-Free Kids Act of 2010; Final Rule. 7 CFR Parts 210, 215, 220. Fed Regist. 2016;81:24348-24383.

        • Rida Z
        • Burger C
        • Dev D
        • Smith J
        • Hasnin S
        Assessment of nutrition knowledge of childcare providers regarding the implementation of the 2017 CACFP meal pattern update.
        Am J Health Educ. 2018; 49: 384-394
        • Ward DS
        • Benjamin SE
        • Ammerman AS
        • Ball SC
        • Neelon BH
        • Bangdiwala SI
        Nutrition and physical activity in child care: results from an environmental intervention.
        Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: 352-356
        • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
        NAPP SACC.
        Date accessed: May 3, 2019
        • Dev DA
        • Williams N
        • Iruka I
        • et al.
        Improving the nutrition and screen time environment through self-assessment in family childcare homes in Nebraska.
        Public Health Nutr. 2018; 21: 2351-2359
        • Willis GB
        Cognitive Interviewing. A “how to” guide.
        Evaluation. 1999; 5: 1-37
      4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The spectrum of opportunities framework for state-level obesity prevention efforts targeting the early care and education setting. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. Accessed May 3, 2019.

      5. Step Up to Quality. GO NAP SACC. Accessed May 3, 2019.

        • Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services
        Title 391 children's services licensing.
        Date accessed: June 19, 2019
        • Benjamin SE
        • Rifas-Shiman SL
        • Taveras EM
        • et al.
        Early child care and adiposity at ages 1 and 3 years.
        Pediatrics. 2009; 124: 555-562
        • Dev DA
        • McBride BA
        • Harrison K
        Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Benchmarks for Nutrition in child Care 2011: are child-care providers across contexts meeting recommendations?.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 1346-1353
        • Andreyeva T
        • Henderson KE
        Center-reported adherence to nutrition standards of the child and adult care food program.
        Child Obes. 2018; 14: 421-428
        • Dev DA
        • Speirs KE
        • McBride BA
        • Donovan SM
        • Chapman-Novakofski K
        Head Start and child care providers’ motivators, barriers and facilitators to practicing family-style meal service.
        Early Child Res Q. 2014; 29: 649-659
        • Dev DA
        • Carraway-Stage V
        • Schober DJ
        • McBride BA
        • Kok CM
        • Ramsay S
        Implementing the academy of nutrition and dietetics benchmarks for nutrition education for children: child-care providers’ perspectives.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 117: 1963-1971.e2
        • Larson N
        • Loth KA
        • Nanney MS
        Staff training interests, barriers, and preferences in rural and urban child care programs in Minnesota.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019; 51: 335-341
        • Weigel DJ
        • Weiser DA
        • Bales DW
        • Moyses KJ
        Identifying online preferences and needs of early childhood professionals.
        Early Child Res Pract. 2012; 14: 1-20
        • McCann BM
        The effectiveness of Extension in-service training by distance: perception versus reality.
        J Ext. 2007; 45: 1FEA4
      6. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. Child Care Licensing. Accessed June 19, 2019.

        • Lutfiyya MN
        • Lipsky MS
        • Wisdom-Behounek J
        • Inpanbutr-Martinkus M
        Is rural residency a risk factor for overweight and obesity for US children?.
        Obesity. 2007; 15: 2348-2356
        • Shea J
        • Joaquin ME
        • Gorzycki M
        Hybrid course design: promoting student engagement and success.
        J Public Aff Educ. 2015; 21: 539-556
        • Ardichvili A
        • Page V
        • Wentling T
        Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice.
        J Knowl Manag. 2003; 7: 64-77
        • Wenger E
        Communities of practice and social learning systems.
        Organ. 2000; 7: 225-246
      7. Curtis D, Lebo D, Cividanes WCM, Carter M. Reflecting in Communities of Practice: a Workbook for Early Childhood Educators. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press; 2013:414.

        • Schachter RE
        • Gerde HK
        • Hatton-Bowers H
        Guidelines for Selecting Professional Development for Early Childhood Teachers.
        Early Child Educ J. 2019; 47: 395-408