Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 52, ISSUE 5, P512-521, May 2020

Download started.

Ok

Use of Decision Cases for Building SNAP-Ed Implementers’ Capacities to Realize Policy, Systems, and Environmental Strategies

Published:October 31, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.09.020

      Abstract

      Objective

      To develop and validate decision cases as a capacity-building training tool for implementing policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) change strategies.

      Design

      Study phases were: (1) in-depth interviews conducted repeatedly over a year with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) partner sites and once with SNAP-Ed implementers to identify dilemmas when implementing PSE change strategies; (2) decision cases developed to highlight dilemmas; and (3) focus groups with SNAP-Ed implementers to determine decision case utility as a capacity-building training tool.

      Setting

      A southeastern state.

      Participants

      SNAP-Ed partner sites and implementers; Focus group participants.

      Intervention

      Decision cases.

      Analysis

      To establish content validity, a thematic analysis of interviews identified common dilemmas when implementing PSE change strategies. SNAP-Ed implementers’ focus groups provided feedback to determine the utility and validity of decision cases developed from the analysis.

      Results

      Common dilemmas of implementation of PSE change strategies reported by SNAP-Ed partner sites (n = 20) and implementers (n = 8) were lack of site and educator readiness and capacity; communication breakdowns; and prioritization of nutrition education over PSE implementation. Focus group participants (n = 8) reviewed a case and discussion guide and recommended them as a capacity-building tool for training.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Using decision cases could help build SNAP-Ed implementers’ capacities to implement nutrition PSE change strategies and strengthen partnerships.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

      1. US Department of Agriculture. A short history of SNAP. 2018. https://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/short-history-snap. Accessed March 8, 2019.

      2. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) plan guidance federal fiscal year 2019. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2018.https://snaped.fns.usda.gov/snap/Guidance/FY2019SNAPEd-PlanGuidanceFULL.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2019.

      3. Gleason S, Wolford B, Wilkin M, et al. Analysis of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) data for All States Study (Summary). Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2018.https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/ops/SNAPED-Data-AllStates-Summary.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2019.

      4. Cornell University. PSE training: making the healthy choice the easy choice. Food and Nutrition Education inCommunities. https://fnec.cornell.edu/home/pse-training/. Accessed March 8, 2019.

      5. De Marco M, Chipman H, Naja-Reise A, et al. Measurement of policy systems and environmental change in EFNEP and SNAP-Ed programs. Presented at: Southern Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Center of Excellence, Chapel Hill, NC. 2016.https://snapedtoolkit.org/app/uploads/measurement-of-policy-systems-environmental-change.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2019.

      6. Southern Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Center of Excellence. PSE change – creating healthy local places. https://psechange.org/. Accessed March 8, 2019.

      7. Franck K. 2016 Delphi Study Summary: Barriers, Facilitators, and training needs for successful PSE implementation in SNAP-Ed and EFNEP. 2016.https://snapedpse.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/RNECE-PSE-Delphi-summary-2016.pdf. Accessed March 8, 2019.

        • Barnidge EK
        • Radvanyi C
        • Duggan K
        • et al.
        Understanding and addressing barriers to implementation of environmental and policy interventions to support physical activity and healthy eating in rural communities.
        J Rural Health. 2013; 29: 97-105
        • Haynes-Maslow L
        • Parsons SE
        • Wheeler SB
        • Leone LA
        Understanding barriers to fruit and vegetable consumption among low-income individuals: a qualitative study.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10: 1202-1206
        • von Glasersfeld E
        Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning.
        The Falmer Press, London1995
        • Taber KS
        Beyond constructivism: the progressive research programme into learning science.
        Stud Sci Educ. 2006; 10: 125-184
        • Taber KS
        Exploring student learning from a constructivist perspective in diverse educational contexts.
        J Turk Sci Educ. 2008; 5: 2-21
        • Iachini A
        • Wolfer TA
        Promoting school mental health competencies: exploring the utility of decision cases for pre-service learning.
        Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2015; 8: 104-120
      8. Merseth KK. Cases, case methods, and the professional development of educators. ERIC Digest. 1994.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED401272.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2019.

        • Yin R
        Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2017
        • Walsham G
        Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method.
        Eur J Inf Syst. 1995; 4: 74-81
        • Schmidt HG
        • Van der Molen HT
        • Te Winkel W
        • Wijnen WH
        Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: a meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school.
        Educ Psychol. 2009; 44: 227-249
        • Wolfer TA
        • Gray KA
        Using the decision case method to teach legislative policy advocacy.
        J Teach Soc Work. 2007; 27: 37-59
        • Macpherson I
        • Brooker R
        • Ainsworth P
        Case study in the contemporary world of research: using notions of purpose, place, process and product to develop some principles for practice.
        Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2000; 3: 49-61
        • Wolfer TA
        • Scales TL
        Decision Cases for Advanced Social Work Practice: Thinking Like a Social Worker.
        Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA2006
      9. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station. Principles for transitioning to organic farming: e-learning materials and decision case studies for educators.https://www.maes.umn.edu/sheaffer13-g27. Accessed March 8, 2019.

        • Glaser B
        • Strauss L
        The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
        Aldine Publishing Co, New York, NY1967
        • Baxter P
        • Jack S
        Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers.
        Qual Rep. 2008; 13: 544-559
        • Mansell I
        • Bennett G
        • Northway R
        • Mead D
        • Moseley L
        The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection.
        Nurse Res. 2004; 11: 79-88
        • Krueger RA
        • Casey MA
        Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research.
        4th ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2009
        • Kitzinger J
        Qualitative research: introducing focus groups.
        BMJ. 1995; 311: 299-302
        • Bender DE
        • Ewbank D
        The focus group as a tool for health research: issues in design and analysis.
        Health Transit Rev. 1994; 4: 63-79
        • Stewart DW
        • Shamdasani PN
        • Rook DW
        Focus Groups: Theory and Practice.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2007
        • Willis GB
        Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design.
        Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2004
      10. Dollah S, Abduh A, Rosmaladewi M. Benefits and drawbacks of NVivo QSR application. Presented at: The 2nd International Conference on Education, Science, and Technology. 2017.https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icest-17/25884907. Accessed March 8, 2019.

        • Patton MQ
        Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.
        4th ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA2015
        • Lincoln YS
        • Guba EG
        Naturalistic Inquiry.
        Sage, Newbury Park, CA1985
        • Heitzmann R
        Case study instruction in teacher education: opportunity to develop students’ critical thinking, school smarts and decision making.
        Educ. 2008; 128: 523-541
        • Chin PC
        Linking theory to practice: a case-based approach in teacher education.
        Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014; 123: 280-288
        • Merseth K
        The Case for Cases in Teacher Education.
        American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Washington, DC1991
        • Franke V
        Decision-making under uncertainty: using case studies for teaching strategies in complex environments.
        J Mil Strateg Stud. 2011; 13: 1-21
        • Swinton SM
        • Nott SB
        After the Fire.
        in: Swinton SM Teaching and Learning With Cases: Promoting Active Learning in Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources Education. College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI1995: 144-157
        • Lynn LE
        Teaching and Learning With Cases.
        Chatham House Publishers, New York, NY1999
        • Head BA
        • Bays C
        Engaging nursing students and community partners in the development of decision cases.
        J Nurs Educ. 2010; 49: 346-350
        • Francis C
        • King J
        • Lieblein G
        • et al.
        Open-ended cases in agroecology: farming and food systems in the Nordic Region and the US Midwest.
        J Agric Educ Ext. 2009; 15: 385-400
        • Reicks M
        • Stoebner T
        • Hassel C
        • Carr T
        Evaluation of a decision case approach to food biotechnology education at the secondary level.
        J Nutr Educ. 2003; 28: 33-38