Perceptions of Rural SNAP-Authorized Food Store Owners and Managers About Healthy Product Availability

Published:November 13, 2019DOI:



      Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)–authorized retailers’ healthy perceptions and store availability of healthy products were explored to plan a healthy food retail program.


      Cognitive anthropology (free list) and quantitative (food environment measure) methods were used to assess retailers’ healthy product perceptions and the availability of store products aligned with dietary guidance. Cultural domain analysis techniques and descriptive and inferential statistics were used to interpret data.


      SNAP–authorized retailers (n = 29) of rural grocery (17%), dollar (14%), convenience (66%), and specialty (3%) stores participated. There was low salience for what constituted healthy and misalignments with dietary guidance and inventory. Dried beans, nuts, and seeds were widely available products across all stores and were listed less frequently by retailers.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Engagement with SNAP–authorized retailers to develop retailer-focused nutrition education and/or training protocols is warranted to improve the capacity for retailers to market store products aligned with dietary guidance.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.
      Join SNEB today online


      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Oliveira V.
        The Food Assistance Landscape: FY 2018 Annual Report.
        Economic Research Service, Washington, DC2019
        • US Department of Agriculture
        2017 SNAP retailer management year end summary.
        Food and Nutrition Service, Washington, DC2017
      1. US Department of Agriculture. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): is my store eligible? Washington, DC: Food and Nutrition Service; 2018. Accessed November 8, 2018.

      2. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020. 8th edition. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture; 2015. Accessed November 8, 2018.

        • Mancino L
        • Guthrie J
        • Ver Ploeg M
        • Lin BH
        Nutritional Quality of Foods Acquired by Americans: Findings From USDA's National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey.
        Economic Research Service, Washington, DC2018
      3. SNAP-Ed Connection, US Department of Agriculture. Policy, systems, and environmental change. Accessed November 19, 2018.

        • Racine EF
        • Batada A
        • Solomon CA
        • Story M
        Availability of foods and beverages in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program-authorized dollar stores in a region of North Carolina.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016; 116: 1613-1620
        • Racine EF
        • Kennedy A
        • Batada A
        • Story M
        Foods and beverages available at SNAP-authorized drugstores in sections of North Carolina.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017; 49: 674-683
        • DeWeese RS
        • Todd M
        • Karpyn A
        • et al.
        Healthy store programs and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), but not the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), are associated with corner store healthfulness.
        Prev Med Rep. 2016; 4 (256-261)
        • Thorndike A
        • Sunstein C.
        Obesity prevention in the supermarket-choice architecture and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107: 1582-1583
        • Gordon E
        • Dawkins-Lyn N
        • Hogan-Yarbro R
        • et al.
        Approaches for Promoting Healthy Food Purchases by SNAP Participants.
        Food and Nutrition Service, Washington, DC2014
        • Kraak V
        • Englund T
        • Misyak S
        • Serrano E
        A novel marketing-mix and choice-architecture framework to nudge restaurant customers toward healthy food environments to reduce obesity in the United States.
        Obes Rev. 2017; 18: 852-868
        • Houghtaling B
        • Kraak VI
        • Harden SM
        • Davis GC
        • Misyak S
        • Misyak SA
        A systematic review of factors that influence food store owner and manager decision making and ability/willingness to use choice architecture and marketing mix strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases in the United States, 2005–2017.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019; 16: 5
        • Smith Maguire J
        • Matthews J
        Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context.
        Eur J Cult Stud. 2012; 15: 551-562
        • Ward V
        • House A
        • Hamer S
        Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain?.
        Evid Policy. 2009; 5: 267-279
        • Haynes-Maslow L
        • Andress L
        • Pitts SJ
        • et al.
        Arguments used in public comments to support or oppose the US Department of Agriculture's minimum stocking requirements: A content analysis.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118: 1664-1672
        • Glasgow RE
        What does it mean to be pragmatic? Pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation.
        Health Educ Behav. 2013; 40: 257-265
        • Gravlee CC
        • Boston PQ
        • Mitchell MM
        • Schultz AF
        • Betterley C
        Food store owners’ and managers’ perspectives on the food environment: an exploratory mixed-methods study.
        BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 1031
        • Proctor E
        • Silmere H
        • Raghavan R
        • et al.
        Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement Challenges, and research agenda.
        Admin Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38: 65-76
        • Wandersman A
        • Duffy J
        • Flaspohler P
        • et al.
        Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation.
        Am J Commun Psychol. 2008; 41: 171-181
        • Joanna CM
        • Kelsey SD
        • Nicole AS
        • Borsika R
        • Gregory AA
        Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.
        Implement Sci. 2019; 14: 1
        • Proctor EK
        • Powell BJ
        • McMillen JC
        Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting.
        Implement Sci. 2013; 8: 139
        • Powell BJ
        • Waltz TJ
        • Chinman MJ
        • et al.
        A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.
        Implement Sci. 2015; 10: 1-14
        • Houghtaling B
        • Serrano E
        • Dobson L
        • et al.
        Rural SNAP-authorized food store owners’ and managers’ perceived feasibility to implement marketing-mix and choice-architecture strategies to encourage healthy product purchasing by SNAP consumers.
        Transl Behav Med. 2019; 9: 888-898
      4. University of Wisconsin School of Medicine Public Health. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) v2.0. 2013. Accessed August 31, 2018.

      5. Population Health Institute. County health rankings – Virginia. County health rankings & roadmaps. Accessed November 8, 2018.

      6. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. SNAP retailer locator. Accessed August 29, 2018.

      7. Eat Smart Move More North Carolina. Healthy retail toolkit for small food stores. North Carolina Healthy Food Retail Designation. Accessed February 10, 2019.

      8. Borgatti SP. Eliciation techniques for cultural domain analysis. The Ethnographer's Toolkit. Vol 3. Walnut Creek, CA: Altimira Press; 1998.

        • Smith JJ
        • Borgatti SP
        Salience counts–and so does accuracy: correcting and updating a measure for free-list-item salience.
        J Ling Anthropol. 1997; 7: 208-209
        • Misyak SA
        • Hedrick VE
        • Pudney E
        • Serrano EL
        • Farris AR
        Reliability of a market basket assessment tool (MBAT) for use in SNAP-Ed healthy retail initiatives.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018; 50: 511-515
        • Lieffers JRL
        • Ekwaru JP
        • Ohinmaa A
        • Veugelers PJ
        The economic burden of not meeting food recommendations in Canada: the cost of doing nothing.
        PLOS ONE. 2018; 13: e0196333
        • Israel BA
        • Schulz AJ
        • Parker EA
        • Becker AB
        Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173-202
        • Ross A
        • Krishnan N
        • Panchal J
        • et al.
        Formative research for an innovative smartphone application to improve distribution of healthy foods to corner stores in Baltimore City.
        Ecol Food Nutr. 2019; 58: 3-22
        • Martin KS
        • Wolff M
        • Callahan K
        • Schwartz MB
        Supporting wellness at pantries: development of a nutrition stoplight system for food banks and food pantries.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; 119: 553-559
        • Weiner BJ
        • Lewis CC
        • Stanick C
        • et al.
        Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 108
        • Coleman-Jensen A
        • Rabbitt MP
        • Gregory CA
        • Singh A
        Household Food Security in the United States in 2016.
        Economic Research Service, Washington, DC2017
        • US Department of Agriculture. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children
        (WIC) Revisions in the WIC Food Packages: Final Rule.
        US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC2014
        • Glanz K
        • Basil M
        • Maibach E
        • Goldberg J
        • Snyder D
        Why Americans eat what they do: taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1998; 98: 1118-1126