Report| Volume 52, ISSUE 5, P546-552, May 2020

Identification of a Framework for Best Practices in Nutrition Education for Low-Income Audiences

Published:January 17, 2020DOI:


      To promote effective low-income nutrition education programs, an expert panel of nutrition education and public health researchers built consensus around 28 best practices grouped into 5 domains (Program Design, Program Delivery, Educator Characteristics, Educator Training, and Evaluation) targeting direct delivery of nutrition education. These best practices can be used to assess program strengths, promote fidelity in delivery and evaluation, and design research to strengthen programs’ evidence base. A survey of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program–Education nutrition education leaders helped identify staff development needs and interest relative to specific best practices. Best practices can be used to identify staff development needs among frontline educators, supervisors, and program leaders in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program–Education, Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program, and other programs targeting low-income audiences.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.


      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Contento I
        Nutrition Education: Linking Research, Theory, and Practice.
        3rd ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA2015
        • Murimi MW
        • Kanyi M
        • Mupfudze T
        • Amin MR
        • Mbogori T
        • Aldubayan K
        Factors influencing efficacy of nutrition education interventions: a systematic review.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017; 49: 142-165
        • Hand RK
        • Abram JK
        • Brown K
        • Ziegler PJ
        • Parrott JS
        • Steiber AL
        Development and validation of the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE): a tool for assessing the quality of proposed nutrition education programs.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015; 47: 308-316
        • Abram JK
        • Hand RK
        • Parrott JS
        • Brown K
        • Ziegler PJ
        • Steiber AL
        What is your nutrition program missing? Finding answers with the Guide for Effective Nutrition Interventions and Education (GENIE).
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015; 115: 122-130
        • Haynes-Maslow L
        • Osborne I
        • Jilcott Pitts SB
        Best Practices and innovative solutions to overcome barriers to delivering policy, systems and environmental changes in rural communities.
        Nutrients. 2018; 10: 1012
        • Hardison-Moody A
        • Bowen S
        • Bloom JD
        • Sheldon M
        • Jones L
        • Leach B
        Incorporating nutrition education classes into food pantry settings: lessons learned in design and implementation.
        J Ext. 2015; 53: 6FEA4
        • Murimi MW
        • Moyeda-Carabaza AF
        • Nguyen B
        • Saha S
        • Amin R
        • Njike V
        Factors that contribute to effective nutrition education interventions in children: a systematic review.
        Nutr Rev. 2018; 76: 553-580
        • Nanney MS
        • LaRowe TL
        • Davey C
        • Frost N
        • Arcan C
        • O'Meara J
        Obesity prevention in early child care settings: a bistate (Minnesota and Wisconsin) assessment of best practices, implementation difficulty, and barriers.
        Health Educ Behav. 2016; 44: 23-31
      1. US Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service. Supplemental nutrition assistance program education. FY 2019 SNAP-Ed plan guidance: March 2018. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture; 2018. Accessed December 5, 2019.

        • US Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
        The Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program Policies.
        National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Washington, DC2017
      2. Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010. Pub L No. 111–296, 124 Stat 3183, 42 USC §1751 (2010). Accessed January 9, 2020.

        • Baker S
        • Auld G
        • MacKinnon C
        • et al.
        Best practices in nutrition for low-income audiences.
        US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC2014
        • Windsor RA
        Evaluation of Health Promotion, Health Education and Disease Prevention.
        McGraw-Hill, New York, NY2004
      3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The social-ecological model: a framework for prevention. Updated 2015. Accessed December 5, 2019.

      4. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015–2020. 8th ed. Accessed December 5, 2019.

        • Tripp S
        • Helwig R
        • Simkins J
        Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education FY2015 through the Land-Grant University System.
        TEConomy Partners, LLC, Columbus, OH2016
        • US Department of Agriculture
        Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education evaluation framework and interpretive guide.
        • Dollahite J
        • Fitch C
        • Carroll J
        What does evidence-based mean for nutrition educators? Best practices for choosing nutrition education interventions based on the strength of the evidence.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016; 48: 743-748.e1
        • Guthrie JF
        • Stommes E
        • Voichick J
        Evaluating food stamp nutrition education: issues and opportunities.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 6-11
        • Noar SM
        • Zimmerman RS
        Health behavior theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction?.
        Health Educ Res. 2005; 20: 275-290
        • Achterberg C
        • Miller C
        Is one theory better than another in nutrition education? A viewpoint: more is better.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004; 36: 40-42
        • Glanz K
        • Bishop DB
        The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 399-418
        • Glanz K
        • Rimer BK
        • Viswanath K
        Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice.
        5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA2015
        • Auld G
        • Baker S
        • Conway L
        • Dollahite J
        • Lambea MC
        • McGirr K
        Outcome effectiveness of a widely adopted EFNEP Curriculum.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015; 47: 19-27
        • Natker E
        • Baker S
        • Auld G
        • McGirr K
        • Sutherland B
        • Cason K
        Formative evaluation of EFNEP curriculum: ensuring the Eating Smart • Being Active curriculum is theory based.
        J Ext. 2015; 53: 1RIB1
        • LeGros TA
        • Hartz VL
        • Jacobs LE
        Reliability of a kid's activity and nutrition questionnaire for school-based SNAP-Ed interventions as part of a tiered development process.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017; 49: 125-129
        • Windsor R
        • Clark N
        • Boyd NR
        • Goodman R
        Evaluation of Health Promotion, Health Education, and Disease Prevention Programs.
        3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY2004
        • Broekhuizen K
        • Kroeze W
        • van Poppel M NM
        • Oenema A
        • Brug J
        A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update.
        Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44: 259-286
        • Contento IR
        • Randell JS
        • Basch CE
        Review and analysis of evaluation measures used in nutrition education intervention research.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002; 34: 2-25
        • Hamilton J
        • Feldman J
        Planning a program evaluation: matching methodology to program status.
        in: Spector JM Merrill MD Elen J Bishop MJ Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY2014: 249-256
        • Byington C
        • Baker S
        EFNEP and SNAP-ed initial paraprofessional training materials and methods.
        J Ext. 2012; 50: 2TOT6
        • Islam SN
        • Paddock JD
        • Dollahite JS
        Navigating for success: quality staff training translates into improved program participant outcomes.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015; 47: 188-189
        • Baker SS
        • Pearson M
        • Chipman H
        Development of core competencies for paraprofessional nutrition educators who deliver food stamp nutrition education.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009; 41: 138-143
        • Blasé K
        • Fixsen D
        Core Intervention Components: Identifying and Operationalizing What Makes Programs Work.
        Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Research Brief, US Dept of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC2013
        • Durlak JA
        • DuPre EP
        Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation.
        Am J Commun Psychol. 2008; 41: 327-350
        • McHugh RK
        • Murray H
        • Barlow D
        Balancing fidelity and adaptation in the dissemination of empirically supported treatments: the promise of trans diagnostic interventions.
        J Behav Res Ther. 2009; 47: 946-953
        • Leeman J
        • Aycock N
        • Paxton-Aiken A
        • et al.
        Policy, systems, and environmental approaches to obesity prevention: translating and disseminating evidence from practice.
        Public Health Rep. 2015; 130: 616-622
      5. Gregory C, Coleman-Jensen A. Food insecurity, chronic disease, and health among working-age adults. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research report no. (ERR-235) 31. December 6, 2019.

        • Hales C
        • Carroll M
        • Fryar D
        • Ogden C
        Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015–2016. United States Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2017; : 288
        • Ogden C
        • Carroll M
        • Fakhouri T
        • et al.
        Prevalence of Obesity Among Youths by Household Income and Education Level of Head of Household — United States 2011–2014.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018; 67: 186-189
        • Bleich SN
        • Fleischhacker S
        Hunger or deportation: implications of the Trump Administration's proposed public charge rule.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019; 51: 505-509
      6. Parrott S, Aron-Dine A, Rosenbaum D, Rice D, Floyd I, Romig K. Trump budget deeply cuts health, housing, other assistance for low- and moderate-income families. 2018. Accessed December 5, 2019.

        • Schwarzenberg SJ
        • Fox CK
        Protecting our nutrient safety net.
        J Pediatr. 2018; 202: 9-10