Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 52, ISSUE 12, P1111-1119, December 2020

Download started.

Ok

A Randomized mHealth Trial to Promote Vegetable Intake Through Counting and Goal Setting

Published:October 06, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2020.08.009

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine if counting and goal setting can increase red/orange vegetable intake.

      Design

      Pre-posttest experimental.

      Setting

      Midwestern university.

      Participants

      Undergraduate students (n = 165).

      Intervention

      Those in the intervention group (n = 85) were asked to count the number of times they ate red/orange vegetables and set a goal to eat 1 more time.

      Main Outcome Measure

      An estimate (number of times/d) of vegetable intake based on an independent review of uploaded photographs and descriptions of meals from smartphones.

      Analysis

      Generalized estimating equations.

      Results

      For the intervention group, mean frequency intake increased from 0.9 times/d on Monday to 1.6 times/d on Tuesday and to 1.3 times/d on Wednesday, whereas mean intakes for the control group were 1.0, 0.8, and 0.8 times/d, respectively. There were significant group × time interactions for Tuesday (β = 0.8; P < 0.001) and Wednesday (β = 0.5; P = 0.006).

      Conclusions and Implications

      A mobile method that helped people count their daily red/orange vegetable intake and set a goal appeared to increase consumption. This finding suggests that nutrition education programs that provide people with easy ways to track specific dietary behaviors might be effective at helping them attain goals.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Moore LV
        • Thompson FE
        • Demissie Z
        Percentage of youth meeting federal fruit and vegetable intake recommendations, Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System, United States and 33 States, 2013.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017; 117: 545-553.e3
        • Kimmons J
        • Gillespie C
        • Seymour J
        • Serdula M
        • Blanck HM
        Fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents and adults in the United States: percentage meeting individualized recommendations.
        Medscape J Med. 2009; 11: 26
        • Lock K
        • Pomerleau J
        • Causer L
        • Altmann DR
        • McKee M
        The global burden of disease attributable to low consumption of fruit and vegetables: implications for the global strategy on diet.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2005; 83: 100-108
        • Aune D
        • Giovannucci E
        • Boffetta P
        • et al.
        Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 46: 1029-1056
        • Greene GW
        • White AA
        • Hoerr SL
        • et al.
        Impact of an online healthful eating and physical activity program for college students.
        Am J Health Promot. 2012; 27: e47-e58
        • National Cancer Institute
        Usual Dietary Intakes: U.S. Population, 2007–2010.
        National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD2019
      1. US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 Dietary guidelines for Americans. http://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/. Accessed March 23, 2020.

        • Vadeboncoeur C
        • Townsend N
        • Foster C
        A meta-analysis of weight gain in first year university students: is freshman 15 a myth?.
        BMC Obes. 2015; 2: 22
        • Wang Y
        • Xue H
        • Huang Y
        • Huang L
        • Zhang D
        A systematic review of application and effectiveness of mHealth interventions for obesity and diabetes treatment and self-management.
        Adv Nutr. 2017; 8: 449-462
        • Hebden L
        • Cook A
        • van der Ploeg HP
        • King L
        • Bauman A
        • Allman-Farinelli M
        A mobile health intervention for weight management among young adults: a pilot randomised controlled trial.
        J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014; 27: 322-332
        • Marcolino MS
        • Oliveira JAQ
        • D'Agostino M
        • Ribeiro AL
        • Alkmim MBM
        • Novillo-Ortiz D
        The impact of mHealth interventions: systematic review of systematic reviews.
        JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6: e23
        • Norman GJ
        • Zabinski MF
        • Adams MA
        • Rosenberg DE
        • Yaroch AL
        • Atienza AA
        A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change.
        Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33: 336-345
        • Greaves CJ
        • Sheppard KE
        • Abraham C
        • et al.
        Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions.
        BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 119
        • Werch CE
        • Bian H
        • Moore MJ
        • Ames S
        • DiClemente CC
        • Weiler RM
        Brief multiple behavior interventions in a college student health care clinic.
        J Adolesc Health. 2007; 41: 577-585
        • Michie S
        • Abraham C
        • Whittington C
        • McAteer J
        • Gupta S
        Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression.
        Health Psychol. 2009; 28: 690-701
        • Cullen KW
        • Baranowski TOM
        • Smith SP
        Using goal setting as a strategy for dietary behavior change.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101: 562-566
        • MacLeod L
        Making SMART goals smarter.
        Physician Exec. 2012; 38 (72): 68-70
        • Keim NL
        • Forester SM
        • Lyly M
        • Aaron GJ
        • Townsend MS
        Vegetable variety is a key to improved diet quality in low-income women in California.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014; 114: 430-435
        • Burke LE
        • Wang J
        • Sevick MA
        Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2011; 111: 92-102
        • Mazzeo-Caputo SE
        • Danish SJ
        • Kris-Etherton PM
        Dietary change: prescription vs. goal setting.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 1985; 85: 553-556
        • Schnoll R
        • Zimmerman BJ
        Self-regulation training enhances dietary self-efficacy and dietary fiber consumption.
        J Am Diet Assoc. 2001; 101: 1006-1011
        • Burke LE
        • Swigart V
        • Warziski Turk M
        • Derro N
        • Ewing LJ
        Experiences of self-monitoring: successes and struggles during treatment for weight loss.
        Qual Health Res. 2009; 19: 815-828
        • Kang H
        The prevention and handling of the missing data.
        Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013; 64: 402-406
        • Roark RA
        • Niederhauser VP
        Fruit and vegetable intake: issues with definition and measurement.
        Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16: 2-7
        • Shilts MK
        • Horowitz M
        • Townsend MS
        Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: a review of the literature.
        Am J Health Promot. 2004; 19: 81-93
        • Byers T
        Food frequency dietary assessment: how bad is good enough.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154: 1087-1088
        • McHugh ML
        Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.
        Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012; 22: 276-282
        • Faul F
        • Erdfelder E
        • Lang A-G
        • Buchner A
        G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
        Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175-191
      2. Decision Support Systems (DSS) Research. DSS calculators.https://www.sphanalytics.com/sample-size-calculator-using-average-values/. Accessed September 14, 2020.

        • Schober P
        • Vetter TR.
        Repeated measures designs and analysis of longitudinal data: if at first you do not succeed-try, try again.
        Anesth Analg. 2018; 127: 569-575
        • Ballinger GA
        Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis.
        Organ Res Methods. 2004; 7: 127-150
        • Burke LE
        • Conroy MB
        • Sereika SM
        • et al.
        The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial.
        Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011; 19: 338-344
        • Locke EA
        • Latham GP
        A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance.
        Prentice Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1989
        • Locke EA
        • Latham GP
        New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance.
        Taylor & Francis Group, London, United Kingdom2013
        • Horne PJ
        • Tapper K
        • Lowe CF
        • Hardman CA
        • Jackson MC
        • Woolner J
        Increasing children's fruit and vegetable consumption: a peer-modelling and rewards-based intervention.
        Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58: 1649-1660
        • Li R
        • Serdula M
        • Bland S
        • Mokdad A
        • Bowman B
        • Nelson D
        Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among adults in 16 US states: behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 1990-1996.
        Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 777-781
        • Blanck HM
        • Gillespie C
        • Kimmons JE
        • Seymour JD
        • Serdula MK
        Trends in fruit and vegetable consumption among U.S. men and women, 1994-2005.
        Prev Chronic Dis. 2008; 5: A35
        • Beardsworth A
        • Bryman A
        • Keil T
        • Goode J
        • Haslam C
        • Lancashire E
        Women, men and food: the significance of gender for nutritional attitudes and choices.
        Brit Food J. 2002; 104: 470-491
        • Nour M
        • Chen J
        • Allman-Farinelli M
        Efficacy and external validity of electronic and mobile phone-based interventions promoting vegetable intake in young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Med Internet Res. 2016; 18: e58
        • Covolo L
        • Ceretti E
        • Moneda M
        • Castaldi S
        • Gelatti U
        Does evidence support the use of mobile phone apps as a driver for promoting healthy lifestyles from a public health perspective? A systematic review of randomized control trials.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 100: 2231-2243
        • Glanz K
        • Bishop DB.
        The role of Behavioral Science Theory in development and implementation of public health interventions.
        Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31: 399-418
        • Payne HE
        • Lister C
        • West JH
        • Bernhardt JM
        Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature.
        JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3: e20
        • Kiefer I
        • Rathmanner T
        • Kunze M
        Eating and dieting differences in men and women.
        J Mens Health Gend. 2005; 2: 194-201
        • Robroek SJ
        • van Lenthe FJ
        • van Empelen P
        • Burdorf A
        Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: a systematic review.
        Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 26
        • Schroeter C
        • House L
        • Lorence A
        Fruit and vegetable consumption among college students in Arkansas and Florida: food and culture vs. health knowledge.
        Int Food Agribusiness Manag Rev. 2007; 10: 63-89