Advertisement
Research Brief| Volume 53, ISSUE 1, P60-66, January 2021

Alignment of California WIC Participant Preferences With Proposed WIC Food Package Recommendations

Published:October 31, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2020.09.014

      Abstract

      Objective

      Assess alignment of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) participant preferences with the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine WIC child food package recommendations and compare differences by race/ethnicity.

      Methods

      Cross-sectional examination of survey responses collected between January and May 2019 from 2,993 California WIC families with children aged 1–4 years.

      Results

      Over half of WIC participants (56.1%) wanted an increase in the amount allocated for fruits and vegetables. Many WIC participants (69.6%) thought the amount of juice offered by WIC was just right. Overall, the majority (91.0%) wanted to substitute more fruits and vegetables for juice. Most were satisfied with the amount of beans (78.4%), peanut butter (78.7%), and milk (88.3%). Preferences differed by race/ethnicity.

      Conclusions and Implications

      Preferences of California WIC participants are highly aligned with the proposed National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine changes for increasing fruits and vegetables. Notable differences by race/ethnicity suggest the need for more flexibility.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Au LE
        • Paolicelli C
        • Gurzo K
        • et al.
        Contribution of WIC-eligible foods to the overall diet of 13- and 24-month-old toddlers in the WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study-2.
        J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019; 119: 435-448
        • Tester JM
        • Leung CW
        • Crawford PB
        Revised WIC food package and children's diet quality.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 137e20153557
        • Daepp MIG
        • Gortmaker SL
        • Wang YC
        • Long MW
        • Kenney EL
        WIC food package changes: trends in childhood obesity prevalence.
        Pediatrics. 2019; 143e20182841
        • Metallinos-Katsaras E
        • Gorman KS
        • Wilde P
        • Kallio J
        A longitudinal study of WIC participation on household food insecurity.
        Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15: 627-633
        • Pan L
        • Blanck HM
        • Park S
        • et al.
        State-specific prevalence of obesity among children aged 2-4 years enrolled in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children–United States, 2010-2016.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68: 1057-1061
        • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
        Review of WIC Food Packages: Improving Balance and Choice: Final Report.
        The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2017
        • US Department of Health and Human Services, US Department of Agriculture
        2015–2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
        The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Washington, DC2015
        • Kim SA
        • Moore LV
        • Galuska D
        • et al.
        Vital signs: fruit and vegetable intake among children–United States, 2003-2010.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63: 671-676
        • Di Noia J
        • Byrd-Bredbenner C
        Determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in low-income children and adolescents.
        Nutr Rev. 2014; 72: 575-590
        • Hager E
        • Quigg A
        • Black M
        • et al.
        Development and validity of a 2-item screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 126: e26-e32
      1. National Cancer Institute. Dietary screener questionnaire in the NHANES 2009-10.https://epi.grants.cancer.gov/nhanes/dietscreen/. Accessed May 11, 2020.

        • Langellier BA
        • Pia Chaparro M
        • Whaley SE
        Social and institutional factors that affect breastfeeding duration among WIC participants in Los Angeles County, California.
        Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 1887-1895
      2. US Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study 2: second year.https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/ops/WIC-ITFPS2-Year2Report.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2020.

      3. US Department of Agriculture. WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study 2: infant year report.https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/ops/WIC-ITFPS2-Infant.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2020.

        • Au LE
        • Whaley S
        • Gurzo K
        • Meza M
        • Ritchie LD
        If you build it they will come: satisfaction of WIC participants with online and traditional in-person nutrition education.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016; 48 (e1): 336-342
        • Ritchie LD
        • Whaley SE
        • Crocker NJ
        Satisfaction of California WIC participants with food package changes.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: S71-S78
        • Gittelsohn J
        • Laska MN
        • Andreyeva T
        • et al.
        Small retailer perspectives of the 2009 Women, Infants and Children Program food package changes.
        Am J Health Behav. 2012; 36: 655-665
        • Whaley SE
        • Ritchie LD
        • Spector P
        • Gomez J
        Revised WIC food package improves diets of WIC families.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012; 44: 204-209