Advertisement
GEM No. 606| Volume 53, ISSUE 8, P719-723, August 2021

Yumbox: A Tool to Improve the Quality of Preschoolers’ Packed Lunches

      INTRODUCTION

      Americans eat less than the recommended amounts of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and dairy products.
      • Krebs-Smith SM
      • Guenther PM
      • Subar AF
      • Kirkpatrick SI
      • Dodd KW
      Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations.
      Research also shows that 91% of preschool-aged children do not consume recommended amounts of vegetables.
      • Fox MK
      • Gearan E
      • Cannon J
      • et al.
      Usual food intakes of 2- and 3-year old U.S. children are not consistent with dietary guidelines.
      ,
      Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
      State Indicator Report on Fruits and Vegetables, 2018.
      In addition, empty calories from added sugars and solid fats contribute 40% of total daily calories for 1–18-year-olds.
      • Krebs-Smith SM
      • Guenther PM
      • Subar AF
      • Kirkpatrick SI
      • Dodd KW
      Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations.
      Poor dietary consumption is often cited as a major contributor to childhood obesity and related health issues. Currently, 13.9% of American children aged 2–5 years are categorized as obese.
      One possible explanation for these trends is the fact that many young children are not exposed enough to nutritious foods early in life.
      • Fox MK
      • Gearan E
      • Cannon J
      • et al.
      Usual food intakes of 2- and 3-year old U.S. children are not consistent with dietary guidelines.
      As food gatekeepers, parents and caretakers greatly influence what children eat and model eating attitudes and behaviors at a young age.
      • Mitchell GL
      • Farrow C
      • Haycraft E
      • Meyer C
      Parental influences on children's eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focussed interventions.
      Although parents and caretakers may know the components of a healthy diet, studies have found that they desire practical solutions to provide nutritious meals.
      • Hart LM
      • Damiano SR
      • Cornell C
      • Paxton SJ
      What parents know and want to learn about healthy eating and body image in preschool children: a triangulated qualitative study with parents and early childhood professionals.
      Furthermore, studies have found that lunches packed at home are less nutritious than lunch served at school and tend to contain foods higher in calories, fat, and sugar.
      • Farris AR
      • Misyak S
      • Duffey KJ
      • et al.
      Nutritional comparison of packed and school lunches in pre-kindergarten and kindergarten children following the implementation of the 2012-2013 national school lunch program standards.
      Behavioral economics research suggests that by changing the environment, behavior can be influenced.
      • Cohen DA
      • Babey SH
      Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices.
      ,
      • Thaler RH
      • Sunstein CR
      Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness.
      Studies have shown increasing the visibility of healthy foods increases the likelihood that students will select and consume them. Studies using plates with sections for fruits and vegetables,
      • Melnick EM
      • Li M
      Association of plate design with consumption of fruits and vegetables among preschool children.
      or placing photographs of fruits and vegetables
      • Reicks M
      • Redden JP
      • Mann T
      • Mykerezi E
      • Vickers Z
      Photographs in lunch tray compartments and vegetable consumption among children in elementary school cafeterias.
      on plates/trays found an increase in fruit and vegetable selection and consumption
      • Hart LM
      • Damiano SR
      • Cornell C
      • Paxton SJ
      What parents know and want to learn about healthy eating and body image in preschool children: a triangulated qualitative study with parents and early childhood professionals.
      in children. Yumbox provides distinct compartments for the recommended food components, leveraging the visibility principles of behavioral economics theory. Caretakers may be more likely to pack lunches that include more components of the US Department of Agriculture MyPlate

      MyPlate, US Department of Agriculture. MyPlate. https://www.choosemyplate.gov/. Accessed September 14, 2020.

      because of visual cues present in Yumbox. To test this hypothesis, a pilot program examined whether the Yumbox lunchbox, a bento-style box with compartments labeled for each component of a complete meal (vegetable, fruit, dairy, grain, protein) that is based on the US Department of Agriculture MyPlate,

      MyPlate, US Department of Agriculture. MyPlate. https://www.choosemyplate.gov/. Accessed September 14, 2020.

      would influence the number and types of foods that caretakers of preschoolers packed for their children's lunches.

      PILOT PROGRAM DESIGN

      In piloting this program, a Yumbox was given to each child enrolled in a preschool (intervention school) whose parents or guardians consented for their participation (n = 30). Parents and caretakers received a brief orientation on how to use the Yumbox, as well as a list of suggestions for foods that would fit into each section. A similar preschool was selected to compare the content of students’ lunches (control school; n = 26). Both schools were private, Montessori preschools where students bring lunch to school every day. The mean age of participants in the intervention school was 3.74 years, and 3.76 years in the control school. The intervention school enrollment was 53% boys and 47% girls, and the control school was 49% boys, 51% girls. Although neither school was able to provide demographics on race or ethnicity, the 2 schools are located less than 8 miles apart in communities that are similar in racial/ethnic makeup, and according to the schools’ directors, the racial and ethnic makeup of the schools’ student populations reflect that of their catchment areas.
      The contents of the students’ lunches in both preschools were documented over 3 days by a team of 3 trained research assistants. The original plan was to complete 10 days of lunch observations; however, after 3 days, both schools closed because of coronavirus disease 2019 quarantine mandates. During each lunch period on the 3 days of assessments, the research team photographed the lunch of each student in the control and intervention schools (n = 110 lunches) without linking the lunches to any individual student at the request of the schools.
      The photographs were then analyzed by undergraduate students in nutritional sciences to identify if a meal component was present or absent in the student's lunch (see Figure). When a food contained more than 1 component (eg, macaroni and cheese), those 2 components were categorized into their 2 distinct categories (eg, grain and dairy). All analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 26.0, IBM Corporation, 2019). Descriptive statistics of food present for each food component (vegetable, fruit, dairy, grain, and protein) for both the intervention and control schools were conducted. Chi-square analyses were also conducted to assess significant group differences in the presence of each food component. A comparison of the mean number of food components present in each student's lunch was used to assess the impact of the intervention. In addition to analyzing the contents of students’ lunches, online surveys were distributed to staff and caretakers in the intervention school after the data collection took place to ascertain their opinions and experiences with the Yumbox. The staff survey was given to teachers and aides who were present in each classroom during lunchtime, and therefore able to observe the children eat lunch daily. The staff survey included Likert-scale questions asking them to indicate how strongly they agreed or disagreed with various statements about the Yumbox, such as “Yumbox has made it easier to talk to students about nutrition/healthy eating.” The caretaker survey also included Likert-scale questions asking to indicate their agreement with statements such as “Using Yumbox has helped me feel more comfortable preparing a complete meal for my child.” Both the staff and caretaker surveys also asked 3 open-ended questions about the benefits and drawbacks of the Yumbox.
      Figure
      FigureSampling of photographs of students’ lunches.

      RESULTS

      The lunches were analyzed for the total number (out of a possible 5: fruit, vegetable, grain, protein, and dairy) and percent of meal components present in each lunch, along with stratifying by food component and day assessed. Because so few Americans eat the recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables, these 2 food components were of particular interest. Approximately 44.5% of the lunches in the intervention group had at least 3 food components, whereas only 10.0% of the control group had the same number of food components (Table 1). This study found that the intervention group had a statistically significantly higher number of components (3.8 ± 0.95) than the control group (1.9 ± 0.93) t = −10.56; P < 0.0001 (Table 2). In addition, chi-square tests of independence found that the intervention group had statistically significantly more fruit, protein, and dairy across all days and significantly more vegetables for the first 2 days (Table 3). The effect sizes can be considered very strong for all the daily comparisons,
      • Fritz C
      • Morris P
      • Richler J
      Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
      ,
      • Kim HY
      Statistical notes for clinical researchers: chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.
      except grains in which there were no significant differences between the groups on any day. In addition, caretakers and staff reported experiencing several benefits of using Yumbox, both for themselves and for the children (Table 4).
      Table 1Number and Percentage of Total Lunches That Contained Specified Number of Food Components Over 3 Days
      School0 Component,n (%)
      Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      1 Component,n (%)
      Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      2 Components,n (%)
      Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      3 Components,n (%)
      Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      4 Components, n (%)
      Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      All 5 Components, n (%)
      Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      Total, n (%)
      Intervention school0 (0.0)0 (0.0)5 (4.5)16 (14.5)19 (17.3)14 (12.7)54 (49.0)
      Control school2 (1.8)17 (15.5)26 (23.6)7 (6.4)4 (3.6)0 (0.0)56 (51.0)
      Totals2 (1.8)17 (15.5)31 (28.2)23 (20.9)23 (20.9)14 (12.7)110 (100)
      a Number of lunches in the 3-day period that contained these numbers of components.
      Table 2Mean Number of Food Components Present in Students’ Lunches Each Day by Intervention and Control Groups
      DayIntervention School, Mean ± (SD)Control School, Mean ± (SD)Independent, t tests
      Independent t tests examining significant differences between mean differences of food components for the intervention and control groups
      Day 13.5 ± 0.881.7 ± 0.67−7.15
      P < 0.001.
      Day 23.7 ± 0.981.8 ± 0.98−5.74
      P < 0.001.
      Day 34.1 ± 0.932.1 ± 1.06−6.03
      P < 0.001.
      Overall3.8 ± 0.951.9 ± 0.93−10.56
      P < 0.001.
      a Independent t tests examining significant differences between mean differences of food components for the intervention and control groups
      b P < 0.001.
      Table 3Comparison of Food Components Present in Students’ Lunches Each Day by Intervention and Control Groups
      Meal ComponentIntervention School Students With Component, n (%)Control School Students With Component, n (%)Chi-Square
      Chi-square test of independence was used for categorical variables with degree of freedom = 1. Phi effect size > 0.25 very strong, > 0.10 moderate, > 0.0 no or very weak.14
      PEffect Size (Phi)
      Fruit component45 (83.3%)11 (19.3%)
       Day 113 (76.5%)3 (15.0%)14.1470.0000.618
       Day 218 (90.0%)3 (18.8%)18.5660.0000.718
       Day 314 (82.4%)5 (23.8%)12.8800.0000.582
      Vegetable component39 (72.2%)20 (35.1%)
       Day 112 (70.6%)5 (25.0%)7.6900.0060.456
       Day 214 (70.0%)5 (31.3%)5.3550.0210.386
       Day 313 (76.5%)10 (47.6%)3.2730.0700.293
      Grain component49 (90.7%)49 (86.0%)
       Day 115 (88.2%)17 (85.0%)0.0820.7740.047
       Day 217 (85.0%)14 (87.5%)0.0460.8290.036
       Day 317 (100.0%)18 (85.7%)2.6370.1040.263
      Protein component39 (72.2%)13 (22.8%)
       Day 110 (58.8%)3 (15.0%)7.7440.0050.457
       Day 214 (70.0%)4 (25.0%)7.2000.0070.447
       Day 315 (88.2%)6 (28.6%)13.5270.0000.597
      Dairy component32 (59.3%)14 (25.0%)
       Day 110 (58.8%)5 (26.3%)3.9010.0480.343
       Day 211 (55.0%)3 (18.8%)4.9150.0270.369
       Day 311 (64.7%)6 (28.6%)4.9620.0260.361
      a Chi-square test of independence was used for categorical variables with degree of freedom = 1. Phi effect size > 0.25 very strong, > 0.10 moderate, > 0.0 no or very weak.
      • Kim HY
      Statistical notes for clinical researchers: chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.
      Table 4Caretaker and Staff Survey Results
      Caretaker Survey: Some Notable Results From the Parent Survey (n = 26) Include the Following:
      • 73% indicated Yumbox helped them feel more comfortable preparing a complete meal for their child
      • 69% indicated Yumbox improved their knowledge of the components of a complete meal
      • 61% indicated they had used Yumbox to talk to their child(ren) about healthy eating
      • 61% indicated Yumbox made it easier to know what to pack for their child(ren)’s lunches
      Staff Survey: Some Notable Results From the Staff Survey (n = 4) Include the Following:
      • 100% agreed Yumbox made it easier to talk to students about nutrition/healthy eating
      • 100% agreed Yumbox improved their knowledge of the components of a complete meal.
      • 75% indicated they observed students talking about nutrition/healthy foods since they started using Yumbox

      DISCUSSION

      On average, children in the intervention school had a statistically significant greater variety of foods (at least 3 of the 5 MyPlate components), and their caretakers were more likely to include fruits and vegetables in their meal, thus indicating the Yumbox had a positive influence on the types of foods caretakers pack for their children's lunches. After sharing the results, the administrative staff of the intervention school indicated they would consider making Yumbox their official lunch box so that teachers may use it as a jumping-off point for future nutrition education programming.
      This study reinforces findings from previous studies and the effectiveness of the behavioral economics principle that visual cues may help to ensure the presence of a full component meal. Yumbox may be an effective tool to reinforce positive eating behaviors by facilitating an opportunity for parents and caretakers to consistently create well-balanced meals for their children. Yumbox may be used in any setting where children bring their meals from home, including schools, camps, clubs, and after-school activities. Yumbox provides the change in the built environment (visual cues) that allows caretakers to consistently pack complete lunches for children. Furthermore, when caretakers use Yumbox every day, it has the potential to create a habit of making complete meals on a regular basis that may extend to meals outside school lunches, such as family dinners.

      NOTES

      Approval for this research was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. This manuscript and the pilot program and research behind it would not have been possible without the enthusiastic participation of Unitarian Montessori School and Children First Montessori School and the support of their boards, administrative staff, teachers, students, and parents/caregivers. In addition, the authors would like to thank Rutgers Nutritional Sciences students, Bokyung Kim, Kristen Homoki, and Allison Cooper, who collected and entered data for this pilot program, and Dr Virginia Quick for reviewing the data analysis and manuscript.

      Appendix. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

      REFERENCES

        • Krebs-Smith SM
        • Guenther PM
        • Subar AF
        • Kirkpatrick SI
        • Dodd KW
        Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations.
        J Nutr. 2010; 140: 1832-1838
        • Fox MK
        • Gearan E
        • Cannon J
        • et al.
        Usual food intakes of 2- and 3-year old U.S. children are not consistent with dietary guidelines.
        BMC Nutr. 2016; 2: 67
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        State Indicator Report on Fruits and Vegetables, 2018.
        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2018
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Childhood obesity facts.https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html#:∼:text=Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Obesity%20in%20the%20United%20States&text=For%20children%20and%20adolescents%20aged,to%2019%2Dyear%2Dolds. Accessed March 26, 2021.

        • Mitchell GL
        • Farrow C
        • Haycraft E
        • Meyer C
        Parental influences on children's eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focussed interventions.
        Appetite. 2013; 60: 85-94
        • Hart LM
        • Damiano SR
        • Cornell C
        • Paxton SJ
        What parents know and want to learn about healthy eating and body image in preschool children: a triangulated qualitative study with parents and early childhood professionals.
        BMC Public Health. 2015; 15: 596
        • Farris AR
        • Misyak S
        • Duffey KJ
        • et al.
        Nutritional comparison of packed and school lunches in pre-kindergarten and kindergarten children following the implementation of the 2012-2013 national school lunch program standards.
        J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46: 621-626
        • Cohen DA
        • Babey SH
        Contextual influences on eating behaviours: heuristic processing and dietary choices.
        Obes Rev. 2012; 13: 766-779
        • Thaler RH
        • Sunstein CR
        Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness.
        Yale University Press, 2008
        • Melnick EM
        • Li M
        Association of plate design with consumption of fruits and vegetables among preschool children.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172: 982-983
        • Reicks M
        • Redden JP
        • Mann T
        • Mykerezi E
        • Vickers Z
        Photographs in lunch tray compartments and vegetable consumption among children in elementary school cafeterias.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 784-785
      2. MyPlate, US Department of Agriculture. MyPlate. https://www.choosemyplate.gov/. Accessed September 14, 2020.

        • Fritz C
        • Morris P
        • Richler J
        Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.
        J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 141: 2-18
        • Kim HY
        Statistical notes for clinical researchers: chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.
        Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42: 152-155