Advertisement

Caregiver's Provision of Non-Recommended Commercially Prepared Milk-Based Drinks to Infants and Toddlers

  • Author Footnotes
    † Dr Romo-Palafox was affiliated with the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, University of Connecticut at the time this study was completed.
    Maria J. Romo-Palafox
    Correspondence
    Address for correspondence: Maria J. Romo-Palafox, PhD, RD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, 3437 Caroline St, 3076 St Louis, MO 63104
    Footnotes
    † Dr Romo-Palafox was affiliated with the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, University of Connecticut at the time this study was completed.
    Affiliations
    Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jennifer L. Harris
    Affiliations
    Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    † Dr Romo-Palafox was affiliated with the Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, University of Connecticut at the time this study was completed.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Assess milk type provision (commercially prepared infant and toddler formula, cow's milk, and plant milk) to infants and toddlers, accounting for sociodemographic characteristics and marketing claims.

      Participants

      Caregivers (N = 1,645) of children (aged 6–36 months) recruited through online panels in 2017.

      Methods

      Cross-sectional survey analysis (system of probit equations) estimated associations between sociodemographics and agreement with marketing claims (independent variables) with milk type provision in the past month (binary dependent variable).

      Results

      Most caregivers (63%) of infants (aged 6–11 months) provided only breastmilk and/or commercially prepared infant formula. Sixty-five percent of caregivers of 12-month-old infants provided commercially prepared infant formula, and 47% provided cow's milk. Most caregivers (64%) of toddlers (aged 13–36 months) provided cow's milk; some also provided other non-recommended milk types (51%).Associations between milk types suggested milk-based drink provision should be evaluated as a pattern and not as independent behaviors (all Ps < 0.048). Milk type provision was significantly associated with a child's age (months), household income, and race (all Ps < 0.049). Including agreement with marketing claims reduced the significance of associations between milk type provision and some sociodemographic characteristics.

      Conclusions and Implications

      These findings suggest the need for additional expert guidance to discourage inappropriate and unnecessary milk for young children, provide strategies to transition from breastmilk (or commercially prepared infant formula) to cow's milk, and conduct outreach to communities at risk for health disparities about the dangers of serving milk that is not recommended for their child's age. Research is needed to understand how diverse populations interpret product claims and how marketing may perpetuate health disparities.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access

      SNEB Member Login

      SNEB Members, full access to the journal is a member benefit. Login via the SNEB Website to access all journal content and features.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

      1. Lott M, Callahan E, Welker Duffy E, Story M, Daniels S. Consensus statement. Healthy beverage consumption in early childhood: recommendations from key national health and nutrition organizations.https://healthyeatingresearch.org:443/research/consensus-statement-healthy-beverage-consumption-in-early-childhood-recommendations-from-key-national-health-and-nutrition-organizations. Accessed May 2, 2021.

        • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
        Feeding Infants and Children From Birth to 24 Months: Summarizing Existing Guidance.
        The National Academies Press, 2020
        • Pomeranz JL
        • Harris JL
        Federal regulation of infant and toddler food and drink marketing and labeling.
        Am J Law Med. 2019; 45: 32-56
        • Pomeranz JL
        • Romo-Palafox MJ
        • Harris JL
        Toddler drinks, formulas, and milks: labeling practices and policy implications.
        Prev Med. 2018; 109: 11-16
        • Harris JL
        • Fleming-Milici F
        • Frazier W
        • et al.
        Baby Food Facts 2016: Nutrition and Marketing of Baby and Toddler Food and Drinks.
        UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, 2016 (Accessed May 2, 2021)
        • Choi YY
        • Ludwig A
        • Harris JL
        US toddler milk sales and associations with marketing practices.
        Public Health Nutr. 2020; 23: 1127-1135
        • Berry N
        • Jones S
        • Iverson D
        It's all formula to me: women's understandings of toddler milk ads.
        Breastfeed Rev. 2010; 18: 21-30
        • Cattaneo A
        • Pani P
        • Carletti C
        • et al.
        Advertisements of follow-on formula and their perception by pregnant women and mothers in Italy.
        Arch Dis Child. 2015; 100: 323-328
        • Romo-Palafox MJ
        • Pomeranz JL
        • Harris JL
        Infant formula and toddler milk marketing and caregiver's provision to young children.
        Matern Child Nutr. 2020; 16: e12962
        • Hughes HK
        • Landa MM
        • Sharfstein JM
        Marketing claims for infant formula: the need for evidence.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2017; 171: 105-106
      2. Mintel. US Non-Dairy Milk Industry Report 2017.https://store.mintel.com/us-non-dairy-milk-market-report?_ga=2.77452433.5856974.1620159509-1105239371.1620159509. Accessed May 2, 2021.

        • Schuster MJ
        • Wang X
        • Hawkins T
        • Painter JE
        Comparison of the nutrient content of cow's milk and nondairy milk alternatives: what's the difference?.
        Nutr Today. 2018; 53: 153-159
        • Singhal S
        • Baker RD
        • Baker SS
        A comparison of the nutritional value of cow's milk and nondairy beverages.
        J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017; 64: 799-805
        • Vos MB
        • Kaar JL
        • Welsh JA
        • et al.
        Added sugars and cardiovascular disease risk in children: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2017; 135: e1017-e1034
        • Vitoria I
        The nutritional limitations of plant-based beverages in infancy and childhood.
        Nutr Hosp. 2017; 34: 1205-1214
        • Duffy EW
        • Kay MC
        • Jacquier EF
        • et al.
        Trends in food consumption patterns of US infants and toddlers from Feeding Infants and Toddlers Studies (FITS) in 2002, 2008, 2016.
        Nutrients. 2019; 11: 2807
        • Roess AA
        • Jacquier EF
        • Catellier DJ
        • et al.
        Food consumption patterns of infants and toddlers: findings from the Feeding Infants and Toddlers Study (FITS) 2016.
        J Nutr. 2018; 148: 1525S-1535S
        • Bornstein MH
        • Jager J
        • Putnick DL
        Sampling in developmental science: situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards.
        Dev Rev. 2013; 33: 357-370
        • Czaja R
        • Blair J
        Designing Surveys.
        2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005
        • Presser S
        • Couper MP
        • Lessler JT
        • et al.
        Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions.
        Public Opin Q. 2004; 68: 109-130
        • Hamilton AS
        • Hofer TP
        • Hawley ST
        • et al.
        Latinas and breast cancer outcomes: population-based sampling, ethnic identity and acculturation assessment.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 2022-2029
        • Marin G
        • Sabogal F
        • Marin BV
        • Otero-Sabogal R
        • Perez-Stable EJ
        Development of a short acculturation scale for Hispanics.
        Hisp J Behav Sci. 1987; 9: 183-205
        • Wilde PE
        • McNamara PE
        • Ranney CK
        The effect of income and food programs on dietary quality: a seemingly unrelated regression analysis with error components.
        Am J Agric Econ. 1999; 81: 959-971
        • Ziegler EE
        Adverse effects of cow's milk in infants.
        Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2007; 60: 185-199
        • McKinney CO
        • Hahn-Holbrook J
        • Chase-Lansdale PL
        • et al.
        Racial and ethnic differences in breastfeeding.
        Pediatrics. 2016; 138e20152388
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        The use of whole cow's milk in infancy.
        Pediatrics. 1992; 89: 1105-1109
        • American Academy of Pediatrics
        Breastfeeding and the use of human milk.
        Pediatrics. 2012; 129: e827-e841
        • Critch JN
        • Canadian Paediatric Society; Nutrition and Gastroenterology Committee
        Nutrition for healthy term infants, six to 24 months: an overview.
        Paediatr Child Health. 2014; 19: 547-552
        • Unger SL
        • Fenton TR
        • Jetty R
        • Critch JN
        • O'connor DL
        Iron requirements in the first 2 years of life.
        Paediatr Child Health. 2019; 24 (555–555)
        • Belamarich PF
        • Bochner RE
        • Racine AD
        A critical review of the marketing claims of infant formula products in the United States.
        Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2016; 55: 437-442
        • Garrison MM
        • Christakis DA
        A systematic review of treatments for infant colic.
        Pediatrics. 2000; 106: 184-190
        • MacDorman MF
        • Mathews TJ
        Understanding racial and ethnic disparities in U.S. infant mortality rates.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2011; : 1-8
        • Moy E
        • Dayton E
        • Clancy CM
        Compiling the evidence: the National Healthcare Disparities Reports.
        Health Aff. 2005; 24: 376-387